Somehow I do not believe what they are saying in this video. Seems like just another layer of disinfo campaign.

How is it even legal? Didn't Americans cede all kinds of liberties for the sake of "saving the children" ?

I should probably get rid of that if in there....

https://videos.lukesmith.xyz/videos/watch/2ae80129-417b-41c1-80d3-d04e3adb2f3b

Nice! Thanks for sharing

Good question. Feel free to report the issue here: https://gitlab.com/postmill/Postmill

If she implements a fix, I'll nab it.

And it is possible to implement it properly, since CyberChef has it.

That works. Still weird that this isn't a feature under the hood that just works automagically.

Maybe you need to encode the percent sign in percent-encoding (%25). Let's see if https://archive.is/j7uWQ#10%25 will work.

who are not equipped to navigate the challenges of having a social media account,

Adults ain't either. Especially women have a hard time, since they are addicted to attention. Social media fucks with their brains. Everytime their stupid phone makes a sound they have to check. It's really sad.

Yup it's offline backup of Wiki and other pages and works without JS

Get Okabe, we're going back in time.

Can't argue that.

A video for you too https://v2.incogtube.com/watch?v=t5UPnuSTRjA

This is a list of scientists who have made statements that conflict with the scientific consensus on global warming as summarized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and endorsed by other scientific bodies. A minority of them are climatologists.

Nearly all publishing climate scientists (97–98%[1]) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change

So, because 2-3% of climatologists doubt the findings, that gives them more weight in your opinion than the 97-98%? Climatology isn't a soft science like social sciences, you know?

Considering this website mentions Kiwix on the bottom, possibly yes. Maybe you can also download it and use it with Kiwix software, though I haven't actually checked that.

I'm not against scientific method, I'm against scientific establishment. The cocksuckers who promote agendas for money and power, who suppress genuine research. Those will come up with whatever consensus necessary to saw off all the forests on earth or whatever else satan demands of them.

https://web.archive.org/web/20191115154603/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientists_who_disagree_with_the_scientific_consensus_on_global_warming

/watch?v=lvpwAwvDxUU

Cheapskateguide aka "I want others to provide solutions to my problems free of charge".

If that dude wants to see support for his hardware that old, he better write it himself. It's not locked in like the bullshit that Apple puts out.

Federated apps:

• Funkwhale
• Mastodon
• Peertube
• Reel2bit

If I could watch stuff, listen to music and podcasts + read news on I2P, the clearnet would become much less interesting to me.

It's a browsable backup of stuff?

Hurrdurr, I'm a troll and conflate issues to trigger people because it's cool to be anti-science and pro-bullshit.

Good job

That ship has sailed, too. I can make pretty much none of the things I use. I don't know how to build a house. I can't make a screen, toilet, frying pan, dish washer... looking around me right now, I see exactly zero things that I could have made myself. Not even a bottle out of glass or a simple book. Nevermind the clothes I'm wearing. I can't even make the fabric the cloth is made from.

Thinking back, it started around the time the pocket watch was introduced. So some 200 odd years ago? At least I think basically none of the people owning a pocket watch could have made it by themselves.

I don't think it's a bad thing, either. Someone that knows how to make pocket watches can make a living from it because basically no one else has this specialized knowledge. And everyone else isn't forced to waste time acquiring not only the knowledge, but also the skill to make a pocket watch. Everyone wins.

It's when there is major gatekeeping going on to prevent others from becoming pocket watch makers, that there is a problem.

I know it's hard to accept, for myself as well, but it seems that the following logic applies everywhere, and most apparent at high tech: If you can't make it yourself then you don't deserve to use it. How many of them individuals or small groups have the means to make their own hardware? But everyone seems to have the needs to use it, and the needs grow up with bloatware, as they always do under consumerism.

“Oy vey goyim, there are no jewish shilling campaigns on the internet where people are literally paid to lie to craft a narrative it doesnt exist oy vey you’re insane you’re paranoid” — what literal shills have literally told me

This is the computer I use specifically for testing software designed for old computers.

Then use an OS the software was designed for in the first place.

Our intentional built-in obsolescence

His Inspiron 5100 was released about 2004. That's a full life. Put it out to pasture.

I had one that old, and it died. My oldest working machine is from '08, and another is from '09, and they are showing their age with hardware errors. I expect them to die any moment. It won't be worth replacing components, even if it turns out to be cheap. And I personally couldn't, for example, replace capacitors on a modern computer without destroying it. They consume more power in a year than they're worth, anyway, so it wouldn't be cost effective, which his bullshit environmental analysis ignores.

At some point the one guy complaining his ancient box doesn't work will be the only one who notices, because he has the only working one.

Link :) http://skank.i2p/

Both me and rambler use I2P+ . It's I2P Java Router on steroids. You can always join #saltr on I2P IRC to get more support.