Comments
abralelie OP wrote
Hurrdurr, I'm a troll and conflate issues to trigger people because it's cool to be anti-science and pro-bullshit.
Good job
takeheart wrote
I'm not against scientific method, I'm against scientific establishment. The cocksuckers who promote agendas for money and power, who suppress genuine research. Those will come up with whatever consensus necessary to saw off all the forests on earth or whatever else satan demands of them.
/watch?v=lvpwAwvDxUU
abralelie OP wrote
A video for you too https://v2.incogtube.com/watch?v=t5UPnuSTRjA
This is a list of scientists who have made statements that conflict with the scientific consensus on global warming as summarized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and endorsed by other scientific bodies. A minority of them are climatologists.
Nearly all publishing climate scientists (97–98%[1]) support the consensus on anthropogenic climate change
So, because 2-3% of climatologists doubt the findings, that gives them more weight in your opinion than the 97-98%? Climatology isn't a soft science like social sciences, you know?
takeheart wrote
Kind of like 'global warming' turning into 'climate change' meme because there is no warming?