Recent comments
GadgeteerZA wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by righttoprivacy in Selfhosting I2P XMPP Server by righttoprivacy
OK I'll try on clearnet but not sure if a link was shared at all? I2P can be tricky sometimes ;-)
Thanks for replying.
anoni2p36897 wrote
Reply to 10channel I2P Webring by cumlord
Thank you very much @cumlord for this post. It was really helpful. I had planned to create an i2p eepsite, but I don't think I can manage that at the moment. I have saved the instructions to my list of future projects. Peace.
anoni2p36897 wrote
Reply to Absolutely Haram! by paw_slut
Ai garbage
anoni2p36897 wrote
Reply to Classic MemriTV Meme Coyote by paw_slut
Fuck bots!
bolvan wrote
without 3.5 jack? boooo.
jackal wrote
Nothingburger, another pro-euro government project. European techbros are as obnoxious as american ones, but worse because they shill government encroachment on top of everything bad techbros have culture wise.
paw_slut wrote
Reply to comment by sovereign in Europe’s new chat police: Chat Control legislation nudges forward in the EU by sovereign
Due to the way I2P works, it's harder to block than Tor. It even works in China. We even had a Chinese "chan" board for a while, but it's gone now. R.I.P. Walled City...
paw_slut wrote
Telegram was always a honeypot too, this was evident by the fact that they required a phone number for signup.
Peer-to-Peer and Dark-Web chat apps with algorithmically generated user IDs that are not tied to an email, phone number, or anything else, are the way.
SimpleX, Session, Briar, and Tox are some good ones. (Careful with tox, it's true peer-to-peer, so it reveals your IP to people you chat with)
paw_slut wrote
Twitter / "X" is an American site, hosted in America, operating under American jurisdiction and American law.
EU law and opinions should be completely disregarded.
div1337 wrote
Reply to comment by Override in Anti-Free-Speech War Escalates As EU Unleashes DSA On Musk's X by sovereign
what is it about then?
righttoprivacy OP wrote
Reply to comment by z3d in I2P + (Java) Tunnels Failing by righttoprivacy
Thanks z3d!
I did install that earlier upgrade we were talking about on IRC. And for some reason things happened.
I was afraid my router got banned LOL.
I'm just happy the network is okay - and will be trying the other version today! :)
Override wrote
The EU is retarded in so many ways, but whoever wrote this post is even more.
It takes no more than 5 fucking minutes and and two brain cells to understand that this has nothing to do with "free speech" or the US.
Fuck the EU Fuck the US Fuck Musk
But also, fuck you, OP.
z3d wrote
Reply to I2P + (Java) Tunnels Failing by righttoprivacy
Those issues you're experiencing should be fixed with the latest build, available from:
We should out of the code storm and back on calm seas, apologies for the disruption!
righttoprivacy OP wrote
Reply to comment by GadgeteerZA in Selfhosting I2P XMPP Server by righttoprivacy
Hey sorry about that downtime :(
I've been having really serious issues on both the server and my laptop also running I2P+ at the moment (100% unusable issues hit both until I find a way to fix it, and had a lot going on lately).
I've been trying different things (nothing changed on my network, no firewall changes) and only was able to post this after bringing i2pd server online today - so I could try to find info out on my issue.
I'm sort of wondering if my routers got banned or something unexpected. I do run a set up with various randomization related things that I wondered if could have triggered it.
I'm really confused as to why my routers aren't working ATM.
Not meaning to go on a rant, but you can in the meantime find the post on clearnet as I'm working on my I2P+ routers (I'm going to jump on IRC now that I have i2pd to use i2p for research / repair efforts).
My I2P java has been having issues building tunnels and keeps saying network restrictions - this might have started 2wk ago but I can't seem to build tunnels long enough to do anything.
Going to try reinstalling i2P+ and hope it fixes my issue, but also blog depends on my install so trying to plan this in a way I won't lose anything.
Until I find a fix (going to reach out to community now that I have a way on i2p with i2pd), you can see the same post on clearnet until I figure this out: https://bmc.link/politictech/selfhosting-i2p-xmpp-servers
Sorry about the unexpected downtime for anyone trying to visit. :(
Hopefully will be able to get the i2p blog back / stable within couple days, as plan to try more tomorrow.
GadgeteerZA wrote (edited )
Reply to Selfhosting I2P XMPP Server by righttoprivacy
I'd be interested to read this - can't seem to access the link though: "Could not find the following destination: http://righttoprivacy.i2p/selfhosting-your-own-i2p-xmpp-server/" "Could not find the following destination: http://tube.i2p/watch?v=bY3JUNrcnTA"
Anyone else reaching it still, or have another link??
sovereign OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Yolli in Europe’s new chat police: Chat Control legislation nudges forward in the EU by sovereign
I would expect that some European countries will join the Strict Countries list.
Yolli wrote
What effects will this have on i2p?
Imo at first they will ignore i2p, because of its small size. Once the regulations grip the clear-web/ open internet, I estimate in a decade or two, they will give attention to banning/blocking or changing i2p.
minetest_i2p wrote
Reply to Finding a new secure handle by edgelord420
use a name thats unsearchable a very common name like "bob" or phrase like "idk"(taken).
awdrifter wrote
Reply to A new vision and direction for RAMBLE by Rambler
Finally spent some time to get i2p working so I can post again. It's been a few years, but it seems like i2p is still very slow. The post in f/Vocaloid took about 10 mins. Is there a .onion site for Ramble? In my experience .onion sites are faster than this site on i2p.
c00kiepast3 OP wrote
Reply to comment by revisionist in Anyone else running a mesh router of Tor, I2P and Yggdrasil? by c00kiepast3
I see. I need to take a look at Retroshare, seems cool.
And yes this I have learned too: "please DO NOT run I2P through Tor and vice versa". Not recommended in any way. :D
c00kiepast3 OP wrote
Reply to comment by 0x45 in Anyone else running a mesh router of Tor, I2P and Yggdrasil? by c00kiepast3
Not that much so browsing or using the networks would get unusable.
revisionist wrote
There are studies that proves more than 3 hops do not increase anonymity (so no privacy gain) I run a tor proxy on the same Qube VM I run i2p to access hidden services from both of them. This way I can connect with more people on Retroshare. This is the only benefit of using the two networks at the same time, but please DO NOT run I2P through Tor and vice versa
0x45 wrote
This obviously increase latency.
Stramonium wrote
Reply to comment by codrus in Hardware Backdoors: Intel Management Engine by righttoprivacy
PSP
righttoprivacy OP wrote (edited )
Reply to Flock Safety Surveillance Cams: Like Netflix For Stalkers by righttoprivacy
Not long before this video, Benn Jordan discovered various vulnerabilities in flock safety cameras, leaving few conclusions outside lack of care of the public affected / monitored by these IMHO: https://v2.incogtube.com/watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY
It's not hard to at least encrypt the data.