Recent comments
altonen wrote
Reply to comment by c00kiepast3 in Emissary - a new Rust implementation of the I2P protocols by idk
I agree with what zzz said. The project is in the early phase so it's still missing a lot of features and "institutional knowledge" that java and i2pd have. I hope that by EoY most of the missing features have been implemented and the most glaring bugs have been fixed.
All help with testing and development is deeply appreciated.
c00kiepast3 wrote
Reply to comment by zzzi2p in Emissary - a new Rust implementation of the I2P protocols by idk
Thanks for the info! The one-person project popping out of nowhere makes me a bit wary, so I’ll wait for SSU2 to work properly before diving in. I do host an eepsite, but I’ll hold off using Emissary for that until it’s more polished. Wish I had a spare computer to test it out safely!
DcscZx5idox wrote
Rust Tor implementation Arti 1.0.0(Onion, I2P)
Tor Project describes about benefit of Rust language. Tor Project needed a year to release stable Arti.
zzzi2p wrote
re: safe to use? depends on your risk tolerance and threat model.
The code quality and completeness is very high. Rust is a "safe" language that eliminates a lot of possible issues. But this is a one-person project that just appeared out of nowhere, it will need a lot of testing and review to gain confidence. There's a lot of subtleties in i2p protocols that, if implementers are not careful, may lead to deanon, crashes, etc.
It does have UPnP/NATPMP to open firewall ports. if you're not on a direct IP and it can't open your firewall ports, it's not going to work well, because its SSU2 implementation isn't done, so it can't do peer test and relay.
For now, I wouldn't use it for eepsite hosting if you're concerned about possible deanon. Safe for running with qbittorrent or i2psnark-standalone? Depends on your threat model.
It also may not "look" exactly like other routers, so it may be apparent that there's an emissary running on your IP.
For brave people, please start testing and opening github issues for any problems you find.
cumlord wrote
this is fucking hot as hell mad respect i'd love to experiment
c00kiepast3 wrote
Interesting. How safe can it be to use? Also can it increase speeds of I2P network? I am really new to i2p so enlighten me :p
not_bob wrote
Reply to Upcoming 2.8.2 release to fix SHA256 errors by zzzi2p
Thank you!
R_N wrote
Reply to Firefox addon recommendation: Auto Tab Discard by z3d
Been using this a while. Handy extension.
z3d wrote
Reply to Upcoming 2.8.2 release to fix SHA256 errors by zzzi2p
For I2P+, the fix for errors is already available via the in-console update paths:
righttoprivacy OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Saint_Cuthbert in Hardware Backdoors: Intel Management Engine (good detailed anonymity / privacy threat article) by righttoprivacy
Personally, I've been using older models allowing at least majority neutering of Intel management engine.
coreboot Thinkpads come to mind.
My personal machines are not the "full ME removal", but vast majority partitions, leaving just what is needed to bring up hardware.
Outside this, there are more "modern" options out there from companies, albeit not removed in same way (disabled under HAP bit and others). Some prefer Arm.
But everyone has a different use cases. I want to be able to use Qubes as an option at times, and some older models are not capable of this. T430 (i5-3320M and greater CPU) and later mostly have the right virtualization options for it.
I see UEFI / BIOS being #1 concern along with some network cards that work along with it. Some for AMT.
It is a shame there aren't more options out there.
Saint_Cuthbert wrote
Reply to Hardware Backdoors: Intel Management Engine (good detailed anonymity / privacy threat article) by righttoprivacy
I have heard about Intel putting backdoors in their chips. Is there a good alternative? The puri.sm librum computers theoretically wouldn't be safe, since I believe that they use intel chips.
z3d OP wrote
muaddib2012 wrote
test
Mollusk wrote
Reply to AMD's RX 9070 Series GPUs Will Feature Support For ROCm; Team Red Shows A Running Sample As Well by z3d
Nice to see this being a flagship feature this time around especially as a Linux user.
TronNerd82 wrote
Better time than ever for me to finally ditch my iPhone for a Librem 5, I guess.
sovereign wrote (edited )
Reply to I2P 2.8.0 Released by idk
I have noticed that with release 2.8.0, SAM applications are negatively impacted. I have a SAMv3 application that worked fine on release 2.7.0, it no longer works on 2.8.0.
I'm trying to find out where to file bug reports:
http://i2pforum.i2p/viewtopic.php?t=1322&sid=c7fcb2c2c880bc8199e69acba2ab5215
I'm investigating the issue. Details can be found at:
minetest_i2p wrote
Reply to It's most certainly NOT a crack pipe by THC
no no no, its sleeping meds in a drip tube.
minetest_i2p wrote
d1esel OP wrote
Reply to I live in Russia, ask your questions. by d1esel
OP here. Lately another person has been answering for me here :)
not_bob wrote
Reply to Dillo release 3.2.0 by z3d
We are moving to the future!
DcscZx5idox wrote (edited )
Reply to 2024 stats for the notbob.i2p jump service by not_bob
zzz posted too
Top 100 Jump Requests for 2023, Top 100 Jump Requests for 2024
c00kiepast3 wrote
Reply to comment by altonen in Emissary - a new Rust implementation of the I2P protocols by idk
Awesome to see the developer here. How long did it took to "rewrite" the code using Rust? I am so new to these things that I have no clue where to even begin. Lol. I will definitely spin up a test server during summer time and contribute as much as possible for the project. Keep up the good work!