Recent comments

libertas0ether wrote (edited )

You might spend your best years on children and get nothing but ingratitude and selfishness in return. Not always, but often enough to be a real risk — especially when parents don’t really raise their kids. And nowadays, that neglect has practically become a norm.

this qualifier is key.

You’re a distorted reflection of those who raised you and those who influenced you socially.

everybody has free will. yes, offspring can go off and become failures whether or not their family and friends and environment treated them right. more often than not, it is not the case. if your concern is the risk factor for awful parents, i agree 100%. it is incredibly easy to conceive a child, built into every human being's body. being a smart, good, decent parent? that requires work. if you go into it worrying about the risk of having a kid, but you do nothing to prepare it for life, then you have already failed. and should not be surprised when things turn out poorly.

1

Saint_Cuthbert wrote

Your sentiments are correct. With the social structure that changed after WWII that allowed a society to run without men, to the moral degeneration from the 1960s onward to a society that depicted raising one's own kids as an unnecessary burden, western culture has definitely lost it's foundation.

Keeping a tight rein on what you allow your kids to watch and making good personal decisions for yourself is a good start. Prioritizing family over money, entertainment, and comfort is next. Both self-discipline and the discipline of your children are imperative. Keeping them away from their peers might be the most important of all. Homeschool is the only real way to achieve all of those things.

1

privacy_is_dead wrote

Do you have children though? I mean, everyone has a family, but I think opinions on such subjects would diverge greatly between those with offspring and those without.

Generally speaking, the nanny state has removed the need for families . This is not just with divorce laws, where typically the father can be "removed from the equation", but also with regard to healthcare and the various protections afforded by generous state provisions.

I believe that in 20 years, as states collapse under debt burden, these provisions will be removed. Those that have failed to produce offspring will realise the value of family but it will be too late for them.

What's your Biology of Mind theory?

1

cumlord wrote (edited )

don't think that's a bad idea. probably any decent web framework just with html/css would probably be fine. http://terminus.i2p does this with php/html/css, it's source is on http://git.simp.i2p/fuzzykitten/dev_endboard. i've used flask a lot for some things like http://git.simp.i2p/simp/i2music. there's a rust based wsgi/asgi server granian that offers better performance over the normal gunicorn/uvicorn, also some good web frameworks in rust too though not as mature as many of the standard options. there's vulnerability scanners active in i2p even if you don't publish it to a registrar just to keep in mind, i'm always a little concerned about which endpoints are exposed and how they'd be abused

3

hypertext8589 wrote

By "unsecure JS" they usually mean the fact that clientside javascript can make XHR requests to clearnet servers that try to impersonate you. It was historically an attack vector during the early days of I2P when the recommended way to use it was FoxyProxy which was installed in your normal browser and only routed through your 4444 links ending with "*.i2p". This setup was unsecure as fuck because clearnet XHR requests from i2p page weren't routed through i2p and thus revealed your real IP address. I think those days are long gone and people mostly don't use I2P like that. I personally use "multi-account containers" Firefox extension and everything within I2P container is required to route through 4444 even if it's XHR to clearnet. Average users probably use a dedicated browser or run it within Tor browser. And even then, if you still consider clientside JS to be unsecure, in case of tech like NextJS when you can have purely serverside JS, it's no different from PHP. Idk about Nuxt, but I assume you can also have 100% SSR there.

1

dev OP wrote

I am using Nuxt.js and Vue.js on my professional job. But whenever I research about creating webapp or website on hidden service or i2p, people start talking about how unsecure JS. Even some of the marketplaces on hidden services have two options, no js and js modes. Already talked a bit with ChatGPT but seems like not giving any good answer, that's why decided to create this post.

Maybe I will go with PHP on backend and Pure HTML, CSS on frontend. Seems like it will take a lot of time to setup my boilerplate. Thank you for answer :)

1

hypertext8589 wrote

PHP is a fine choice, but I'd use NextJS personally. I wouldn't go for NoJS, but it's entirely possible to create 100% NoJS website (even forum, imageboard, store) using NextJS. You need to learn a bit of modern web technology to understand how this works. My best suggestion is to talk to ChatGPT about web development in context of I2P and keep asking questions for clarification until you get all the details.

1

w33d3rl1ng wrote

Reply to comment by j8810kkw in Are solar panels so cool? by ded_eban

they are good for both use cases ... I and my friends use similar panels for the household, but I know a lot companies in Germany, who use it for their purposes as well and they are satisfied ... of course for industrial purposes you need more panels and such which can collect enough power

1

HumblePirate wrote

Reply to New Linux Rootkit by z3d

Well finding a zero day and fixing it, selling the solution is a smart way to not only build credibility but also make some $

1

tb3k9d wrote

In China, this is already a criminal offence, while in Russia it is only partially so: ‘Using a VPN for criminal activities (fraud, illegal drug trafficking, etc.) is a criminal offence (punishable by imprisonment for up to 5 years).’ Other countries are currently only introducing document checks for access to adult content, but people are hacking VPNs, so it is likely that once the checks have been fine-tuned, they will introduce fines for circumvention, as in Russia, of $40 - 60 for each case. The circumvention itself and the existence of methods are unlikely to become criminal offences, except in certain circumstances.

1

minetest_i2p wrote (edited )

"getting I2P up and running is more of a challenge. It's not a deal-breaker, but it does require more technical know-how than the average user is likely to have."

Honestly I see this as a strength. It gives a barrier of entry to block out stupid asf normies such as the ones on Tor. Most people here are actually cool, I guarantee the seed/leech ratio on postmans tracker would be 1000% worse if it was as easy as Tor simply because normies ruin everything. also the people that run most of the biggest services here are easily reachable because of the smaller and more chill user base. I can fr just hit up notbob on irc or idk (probably postman as well but havent done that).

TL;DR Tor users are sux because there is not a barrier of entry.

2