Recent comments
edgelord420 wrote
Reply to The Privacy Paradox that Never Was by sovereign
Best way to protest it is getting more people on i2p so the network becomes better and faster, get that i2p propaganda torrent and start spreading :]
edgelord420 wrote
Reply to comment by Unbanned in Google will block sideloading of unverified Android apps starting next year by sovereign
I hope we will reach a point where people fork away from android and we get something similar with Linux on desktops.
edgelord420 wrote
Reply to comment by Unbanned in Google will block sideloading of unverified Android apps starting next year by sovereign
How, did you read the article, this is the whole problem with GrapheneOS it runs on Google Pixel and google wants to prevent you from running Graphene on it
Saint_Cuthbert wrote
Reply to When Deception Becomes the Top Skill — Is There Any Value Left in Family? by Mindless0Scientist
Your sentiments are correct. With the social structure that changed after WWII that allowed a society to run without men, to the moral degeneration from the 1960s onward to a society that depicted raising one's own kids as an unnecessary burden, western culture has definitely lost it's foundation.
Keeping a tight rein on what you allow your kids to watch and making good personal decisions for yourself is a good start. Prioritizing family over money, entertainment, and comfort is next. Both self-discipline and the discipline of your children are imperative. Keeping them away from their peers might be the most important of all. Homeschool is the only real way to achieve all of those things.
privacy_is_dead wrote
Reply to When Deception Becomes the Top Skill — Is There Any Value Left in Family? by Mindless0Scientist
Do you have children though? I mean, everyone has a family, but I think opinions on such subjects would diverge greatly between those with offspring and those without.
Generally speaking, the nanny state has removed the need for families . This is not just with divorce laws, where typically the father can be "removed from the equation", but also with regard to healthcare and the various protections afforded by generous state provisions.
I believe that in 20 years, as states collapse under debt burden, these provisions will be removed. Those that have failed to produce offspring will realise the value of family but it will be too late for them.
What's your Biology of Mind theory?
R_N wrote
Reply to Your dinner's on the dog by StableDiffuser
hilarious
cumlord wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by dev in Recommended web technologies for I2P and Tor projects by dev
don't think that's a bad idea. probably any decent web framework just with html/css would probably be fine. http://terminus.i2p does this with php/html/css, it's source is on http://git.simp.i2p/fuzzykitten/dev_endboard. i've used flask a lot for some things like http://git.simp.i2p/simp/i2music. there's a rust based wsgi/asgi server granian that offers better performance over the normal gunicorn/uvicorn, also some good web frameworks in rust too though not as mature as many of the standard options. there's vulnerability scanners active in i2p even if you don't publish it to a registrar just to keep in mind, i'm always a little concerned about which endpoints are exposed and how they'd be abused
hypertext8589 wrote
Reply to comment by dev in Recommended web technologies for I2P and Tor projects by dev
By "unsecure JS" they usually mean the fact that clientside javascript can make XHR requests to clearnet servers that try to impersonate you. It was historically an attack vector during the early days of I2P when the recommended way to use it was FoxyProxy which was installed in your normal browser and only routed through your 4444 links ending with "*.i2p". This setup was unsecure as fuck because clearnet XHR requests from i2p page weren't routed through i2p and thus revealed your real IP address. I think those days are long gone and people mostly don't use I2P like that. I personally use "multi-account containers" Firefox extension and everything within I2P container is required to route through 4444 even if it's XHR to clearnet. Average users probably use a dedicated browser or run it within Tor browser. And even then, if you still consider clientside JS to be unsecure, in case of tech like NextJS when you can have purely serverside JS, it's no different from PHP. Idk about Nuxt, but I assume you can also have 100% SSR there.
dev OP wrote
Reply to comment by hypertext8589 in Recommended web technologies for I2P and Tor projects by dev
I am using Nuxt.js and Vue.js on my professional job. But whenever I research about creating webapp or website on hidden service or i2p, people start talking about how unsecure JS. Even some of the marketplaces on hidden services have two options, no js and js modes. Already talked a bit with ChatGPT but seems like not giving any good answer, that's why decided to create this post.
Maybe I will go with PHP on backend and Pure HTML, CSS on frontend. Seems like it will take a lot of time to setup my boilerplate. Thank you for answer :)
hypertext8589 wrote
PHP is a fine choice, but I'd use NextJS personally. I wouldn't go for NoJS, but it's entirely possible to create 100% NoJS website (even forum, imageboard, store) using NextJS. You need to learn a bit of modern web technology to understand how this works. My best suggestion is to talk to ChatGPT about web development in context of I2P and keep asking questions for clarification until you get all the details.
w33d3rl1ng wrote
I want a pedal from Linus for my guitar which I use together with Linux and "guitarix" and "Tux Guitar" ... I want this soooo bad ;) ...
w33d3rl1ng wrote
Reply to comment by j8810kkw in Are solar panels so cool? by ded_eban
they are good for both use cases ... I and my friends use similar panels for the household, but I know a lot companies in Germany, who use it for their purposes as well and they are satisfied ... of course for industrial purposes you need more panels and such which can collect enough power
HumblePirate wrote
Reply to New Linux Rootkit by z3d
Well finding a zero day and fixing it, selling the solution is a smart way to not only build credibility but also make some $
Unbanned wrote
Reply to comment by Charlie in Google will block sideloading of unverified Android apps starting next year by sovereign
True, more phones need to support custom operating systems because Android is getting worse and worse.
Charlie wrote
Custom os are almost necessary at this point problem is the devices that support lineageos and the such are far and few between
Unbanned wrote
Needless to say, I think everyone on i2p knows how bad this is. It is time to move to GrapheneOS.
HumblePirate wrote
Reply to comment by ViFlud in Linux 6.16 Kernel released by ViFlud
sad but true.
HumblePirate wrote
Reply to comment by z3d in Finding a new secure handle by edgelord420
interesting
HumblePirate wrote
Based mises.org post. Taxation is theft End the fed Buy Bitcoin
HumblePirate wrote
Reply to comment by minetest_i2p in My First Look into I2P by RogueHashrate
True dat
tb3k9d wrote
Reply to comment by rngsus in New Russian law criminalizes online searches for controversial content by z3d
In China, this is already a criminal offence, while in Russia it is only partially so: ‘Using a VPN for criminal activities (fraud, illegal drug trafficking, etc.) is a criminal offence (punishable by imprisonment for up to 5 years).’ Other countries are currently only introducing document checks for access to adult content, but people are hacking VPNs, so it is likely that once the checks have been fine-tuned, they will introduce fines for circumvention, as in Russia, of $40 - 60 for each case. The circumvention itself and the existence of methods are unlikely to become criminal offences, except in certain circumstances.
minetest_i2p wrote
So purdy
minetest_i2p wrote
Reply to The Privacy Paradox that Never Was by sovereign
99% sure that every user of i2p knows this, also this looks like a bot made it.
minetest_i2p wrote (edited )
Reply to My First Look into I2P by RogueHashrate
"getting I2P up and running is more of a challenge. It's not a deal-breaker, but it does require more technical know-how than the average user is likely to have."
Honestly I see this as a strength. It gives a barrier of entry to block out stupid asf normies such as the ones on Tor. Most people here are actually cool, I guarantee the seed/leech ratio on postmans tracker would be 1000% worse if it was as easy as Tor simply because normies ruin everything. also the people that run most of the biggest services here are easily reachable because of the smaller and more chill user base. I can fr just hit up notbob on irc or idk (probably postman as well but havent done that).
TL;DR Tor users are sux because there is not a barrier of entry.
libertas0ether wrote (edited )
Reply to When Deception Becomes the Top Skill — Is There Any Value Left in Family? by Mindless0Scientist
this qualifier is key.
everybody has free will. yes, offspring can go off and become failures whether or not their family and friends and environment treated them right. more often than not, it is not the case. if your concern is the risk factor for awful parents, i agree 100%. it is incredibly easy to conceive a child, built into every human being's body. being a smart, good, decent parent? that requires work. if you go into it worrying about the risk of having a kid, but you do nothing to prepare it for life, then you have already failed. and should not be surprised when things turn out poorly.