Recent comments

NapkinBlizzard wrote (edited )

Reply to Is Dread's I2P mirror still up? by Zeroday

No, it's not just you. See this thread.

/u/Paris:

I do not trust the i2p network enough anymore. The bloom filter issue caused me to need to burn a whole lot of servers which I would have rather not needed to do. Issues come up but with arti beginning to be production ready the Tor network will only get even stronger.

1

cumlord wrote

Reply to comment by Chronic in I2P+ 2.9.0+ released by z3d

there's a lot of config options and advanced stuff you can do with it. tends to be really good for hosting things too. susimail would be nice as standalone though, i think you can do it but not easy

iirc 25 is the max for priority for a queue system with messages. you can set it up for dev updates to try the newest stuff if you want (though sometimes things can break), i tend to increase the exploratory tunnels to 16. Also like to set http tunnel to reduce tunnel quantity on idle/close tunnel after ~10 mins, select new keys on reopen so i get fresh b32 for http proxy.

when you enable advanced though it gives explanations of what they do in the (?) button on that page

2

Chronic wrote

Reply to comment by cumlord in I2P+ 2.9.0+ released by z3d

Thanks, I actually started using i2p+ a couple of days ago, and I'm really enjoying it so far. Coming from I2Pd, I really didn't expect that much configuration options and features, yet it's a good thing to learn more about how java clients work (with the help of the included Help & FAQ sidebar). The web apps really define the full experience of using i2p, however I know that currently only I2Psnark has a standalone version, so I hope Susimail gets one too. The ability to turn on/off tunnels without shutting down the entire router is also really neat, yet I realized that they come with an [outbound.priority] custom option by default, so I need to look more into that.

I haven't touched the [routerconsole.advanced] option yet, so is there anything specific to look out for when I enable it?

1

righttoprivacy wrote (edited by a moderator )

Reply to comment by privacy_is_dead in Onion Mail by privacy_is_dead

There is an onionmail project that offers both internal tor onion to onion emails, and clearnet (video on this also on channel showing i2pmail below in link).

But highly recommend is I2PMail if you haven't tried it yet. If you're running I2P or I2P+, you can access it via the SusiMail webmail client.

If unaware, you get you@i2pmail.org and you@mail.i2p (internal I2P mail).

Have some videos sharing set up: http://tube.i2p/watch?v=js7ldFYZelk

You can set it up with PGP in thunderbird, and it's free.

My favorite mail service.

2

cumlord wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by j8810kkw in Problem with outproxy by privacy_is_dead

don't self-host this sort of thing publicly, even if you don't register it it will be found, use an encrypted leaseset

similar to tor exit node, http://zzzmirror.i2p/topics/3254 is a good read

tl;dr tinyproxy or 3proxy (there are others), haproxy could be used for load balance, privoxy not be good with lots of connections, zero hops allow for more multihomes and more speed/less latency

acetone is 1 hop, stormycloud and purokishi are both zero hop ( i think)

1

Chronic wrote

Reply to comment by privacy_is_dead in Problem with outproxy by privacy_is_dead

Indeed, Stormycloud Is by far the most solid outproxy and hopefully it stays that way. If you wanna do like me, you can just add all three outproxies and the router normally resolves itself (separated by a "comma-space").

3

MulliganSecurity wrote

Reply to Problem with outproxy by privacy_is_dead

I have set up an outproxy on several machines recently, both stormycloud standard exit and purokishi worked. I did have to wait for a while before everything was stable and I could reliably send trafic through them though

1

bolvan wrote

Reply to Onion Mail by privacy_is_dead

For free plan daily allowed quota for sent/forward messages is -1 messages. You can't send mail without money.

2