takeheart
takeheart said ()
Reply to comment by ghast in Twitter thread where Snowden describes how he would use a smartphone if he had to by ghast
I've read the article. A few thoughts.
If trusting airplane mode is like trusting a drunk to judge if they are sober to drive, then a more secure smartphone would be like a driver trained to drive well enough when drunk. If your threat model assumes you might be hit by artillery fire from state military, then the tools you should use must be military grade. Yet right after that the article picks iphone for their introspection, not because any security issues, but because apparently it's the most common tool meeting preferences and tastes of people dodging artillery fire daily. I have to wonder, who really killed those thousands of journalists, did armed hitmen contributed more or less to the bloodbath than apple's office slaves? The whole premise of inspecting iphone to reduce political murders is wrong. Journos themselves should know better than cryptographers about how much you can trust corporate cocksuckers with your safety. "Asking reporters deep in war zones to carry a separate camera, audio recorder, and word processor to avoid surveillance" would be the obvious practical solution, modern devices can be as compact as smartphone and simply better at their intended purpose, yet the article ditches this solution as a matter of fact. Why? Why are they going along with the murderers by trying to convince their victims to carry the death mark? Making it introspectable does not change the nature of death mark.
What follows is the largest part of article with a ton of technical data on killphone, all on the wrong premise. Didn't you say reporters shouldn't be cryptographers? Now you're feeding them like radiologists, hardware engineers, soldering technicians, forensics experts, and more all to make them more (un)comfortable with their death mark? It DOES fairly shows that the device in question is a tracking monstrosity, but only to those verily technically educated.
After hearing whole performance it sounds like this: in act one solo sings "artillery dodgers - keep using iphone", in act two orchestra plays "hackers and corporate cocksuckers, you've got work to do". In the finale it throws a couple jokes "android is worse, buy iphone" and "tor is safe". And only after the bullshit is over you may hear a single cry from the audience if you're lucky. "Don't use smartphone, you don't have to"
takeheart said ()
How would I use twitter if I have to?
How would I listen to state puppets if I have to?
Good thing I don't have to.
takeheart said ()
Reply to Some Australians are trying a new protest tactic against vaccine mandates: dousing themselves in gasoline and setting themselves on fire by ghast
Why won't somebody do something? Oh, so burning oneself alive is a way of doing something, a political statement. I don't believe so, people don't burn themselves for statement, they do this out of despair, because their life was made unbearable by environment. Kind of happens with mistreated animals: first they cease breeding, then they cease breathing.
takeheart said ()
Reply to As in Life, Computer Problems Never End by HMTg927
Not if you keep making them, like feeding covaids hoax.
takeheart said ()
Reply to 2021.12.28 : Fucked! Nearly EVERY HP SERVER has been Pwned or firmware rootable since 2020 from a ARM SOC on the main server board!! Every server from HP defenseless! Minority Hires in middle management to blame? Idiocy! by smartypants
I don't think it's half-nigger-women fault it's there in the first place, every corporate monstrosity has it's own arsenal of backdoors. But it may be half-nigger-women fault it was discovered and made public.
takeheart said ()
Reply to This company, Envisioning, has federal governments as clients. Its description of a social credit system says that it will be "generally based on parameters predefined by the authorities in compliance with universal fundamental rights". by ghast
universal fundamental rights What those may be I wonder? Let's go on trusty wikipedia which totally never lies nor promotes interests of israel and learn. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_rights third sentence says you have no rights and links on agenda 21. You have been opted out of your rights it seems before you had the chance to opt out of technocracy.
Also that's one hell of bloated website. At least when wannabe masters use it they suffer as much as us peasants.
takeheart said ()
Reply to Boiling the frog by ghast
Not quite cooked without torture, organ harvesting and sterilizations.
takeheart said ()
Reply to SOS message from Australian Aboriginal people by ghast
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Generations again.
For the pain, suffering, and hurt of these Stolen Generations, their descendants and for their families left behind, we say sorry.
... nah, we lied, this time we're gonna butcher them for good.
takeheart said ()
no all or nothing thinking
revolution must be an evolution
protest peacefully
we observe the non aggression principle we will remain lawful
initiation of force is always wrong
Mike made reference to purchasing firearms in his excellent article and I have necessarily removed those
Thank you brave agorist, I can see your resolve.
takeheart said ()
Reply to comment by BlueHat in Social Media Sites Undoubtedly have Shared Blacklists, and You may be on One. by HMTg927
If they don't want you then you don't need them. That's my very permanent solution.
takeheart said ()
Reply to comment by txt in Feds will release a "non-toxic gas" in 100+ NYC locations between Oct 18 and 29. by ghast
Why wouldn't they want to poison people? Not to kill but to make them sick enough to require visit to hospital and force a jab there, or simply for profits. As you said, no accountability.
takeheart said ()
Reply to The Prime Directive and Religion by HMTg927
The mistake is he thinks that religion in general is some kind of scientific area of expertise (in which he is a learned scholar of course) and is a subject to Dunning-Kruger. And hence he can't keep his insights to himself, like a chosen one who is right and everyone else is in the dark. Spiritual pride. Paradoxically, the correct behavior here IS to keep it to yourself, and that is the prime directive which he himself not following through. At least he is forcing objective realism, political mainstream bs and official history.
takeheart said ()
Reply to comment by RiccardoR in Bolsonaro - president of Brasil - censored by RiccardoR
I wish. Even on this site every second post is jewtubed.
takeheart said ()
Or a perfect time to not give a fuck and keep using winxp.
takeheart said ()
Reply to What is an example which the copy became more popular than the original product? by victorio115
Christianity.
takeheart said () (edited )
Here is how i see it, jews included https://bin.snopyta.org/?b12819ab2fe8d787#7qDsYoX8SXgbUxPckDQXYudxDwx1GpVpWJXmKdg1B1VF Basically your chart is capitalism alone in vacuum, with subjects being too vague and hence incorrectly mapped. c. has no will of its own, it borrows filth from above and transmutes it into deeper filth.
takeheart said ()
Reply to The Paradox by Wahaha
I'm pretty sure loli came first.
takeheart said ()
I guess it's the end, it was fun couple of months, but when admin doesn't care and invites police for takeover, I ain't gonna stay to see the same shit unfolding again. Naturally, I'm not blaming you, your own life should always take priority. Take care.
takeheart said () (edited )
Reply to comment by Wahaha in The Transitory Nature of Content on the Internet by HMTg927
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Also here is my autist of the day https://sftn.github.io/ Reading stuff like this touches my soul almost as deep as Baudrillard or Crowley does, and those are supposed to be in every library. So it's not like stuff disappears, more like it becomes so strange that no one can read it and comprehend, the reader itself disappears. One should take care to preserve their sanity, no amount of terabytes of storage will help with that.
takeheart said ()
Scientific establishment had wasted their credibility, just like the boy who cried wolf. And now their puppeteers have to waste money on these nicely animated glittering videos full of shit and spread them through disinformation network that bans opposition. Talk about unrelated non-issues and introduce as the matter of course climate hoax and covaids, factless conclusions that require your trust but afraid to stand in the light of open discussion and investigation.
In the middle the shill was talking about 'established' facts of science that no one should touch exactly because they're established and parrots example with g, so here is another inconvenient video for you https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/banned-ted-talk-the-science-delusion-rupert-sheldrake_M8cdRnJkMgm2VNB.html apparently scientific establishment was very unhappy with it.
Also it's not about money, it's about power and control. TL;DW agenda 21.
takeheart said ()
Reply to comment by abralelie in Climate change: Amazon may be turning from friend to foe by abralelie
I'm not against scientific method, I'm against scientific establishment. The cocksuckers who promote agendas for money and power, who suppress genuine research. Those will come up with whatever consensus necessary to saw off all the forests on earth or whatever else satan demands of them.
/watch?v=lvpwAwvDxUU
takeheart said ()
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Linux has Largely Abandoned Still-Useful Near-Vintage Computers by HMTg927
I know it's hard to accept, for myself as well, but it seems that the following logic applies everywhere, and most apparent at high tech: If you can't make it yourself then you don't deserve to use it. How many of them individuals or small groups have the means to make their own hardware? But everyone seems to have the needs to use it, and the needs grow up with bloatware, as they always do under consumerism.
takeheart said ()
takeheart said () (edited )
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Linux has Largely Abandoned Still-Useful Near-Vintage Computers by HMTg927
If only modern laptops (and desktops) didn't all had hardware backdoors. http://0gitnick.i2p/2021/01/22/article-you-should-be-using-an-old-computer/
takeheart said ()
Reply to How Hackers Could Trick Unwitting Scientists Into Producing Dangerous Genes by ghast
You don't need a weather man To know which way the wind blows.