Recent comments

MilkyPastel wrote (edited )

Oof, as a Biology major this hurts. The definition of "Species" is pretty loose really, it just means members of a similar gene pool that are able to breed with each other. There are 6 different ways "not breeding together" is defined, two of them being "Sexual Selection" and "Mechanical incompatibility"

Those two deer, if someone were to mix their gametes in a petri dish could probably produce offspring, but if they live in the same region they are likely classified as separate species because they just don't mate. Perhaps they give off different mating hormones, and don't recognize members of the other species as potential sexual partners, or due to height differences, penis/vagina size differences, they physically cannot have sex.

Even tho humans look very different none of the 6 types of species separation apply to us. Ethnic groups are more like different breeds of dogs.

2

Wahaha wrote

I think it's futile to measure China by our morals. They have an entire billion people more than the US. (US: 0.4billion, China: 1.4billion people)

And they have less space. It's inevitable that life is cheap in China. If the reality of your life is that other people ain't precious, but wastes of space, obviously your morals will differ. That's also what allows them to dabble in eugenics and create enhanced humans.

1

J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote (edited )

It's a tricky geopolitical calculation, but overall I'm on board with empowering China's competitors. Nothing against China per se, they just need roadblocks until they ditch the concentration camps. This is good news about Biden, I think. I had feared Trump was the only one to go after China. So... thanks for the article!

1

Rambler OP wrote

Reply to Freeze Peach by Rambler

Didn't know where I should post this, and didn't feel like creating a forum for comical things like this.

Well, maybe he'll understand the problem a bit better now.

1

chaomancy OP wrote (edited )

I don't endorse The Daily Stormer, but this open letter to DLive was an interesting read. Pretty sure it was written by Anglin and he's just acting like it's a guest post as a joke.

Whatever you think about the site, it was the free speech canary in the coal mine. Few spoke out against the massive de-platforming campaign when it happened, so a dangerous precedent was allowed to be set.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Stormer#Site_hosting_issues_after_the_2017_Unite_the_Right_rally

3

Rambler OP wrote

I think it's more of an attempt to remain relevant. After watching livestreams nightly for 6 months and watching the tamper tantrums and destruction I, and I assume many others, just got tired of it.

"Yeah, we get it. Police suck. Go protest at a fucking police precinct or outside the offices of the policy makers. Stop blocking traffic and smashing windows and setting stuff on fire, assholes."

0

RoboGoat2000 wrote

Eh, what? Nothing of what you said has anything to do with the types of evidence of voter fraud I listed off. For example: double voters. In some states, just the amount of people that voted twice swayed the election results. That has nothing to do with the pandemic or ratios about mail-in ballots. Just read the fucking evidence. God damn.

1