Recent comments in /f/I2P
NotQball wrote
Reply to comment by Gromag in I2P Retroshare ID Exchange by Gromag
If it works for you, great. There are some fingerprints based on keys. For your own protection, I decided not to drag you into my crap.
Gromag OP wrote
Reply to comment by NotQball in I2P Retroshare ID Exchange by Gromag
Shouldn't I2P (or TOR) protect from being pinpointed, assuming you aren't sharing personal information?
NotQball wrote
Reply to I2P Retroshare ID Exchange by Gromag
I do use retroshare but I do change ID's often. Sometimes it is a just one use only. It is very useful and recommended software but you can't be a sitting duck.
z3d OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by NotQball in I2P+ 2.6.0+ released! by z3d
Differences in the sha hashes are a result of infrequent updates to the i2pupdate.zip being served from http://skank.i2p/i2pupdate.zip ... occasionally a new update will appear, either to add new features (in the recent case, more complete translations) or fix bugs. To identify exactly which revision you're running, you can view the hashes on 127.0.0.1:7657/jars.
In addition, for some users a new release will revert them to vanilla I2P, so updating the I2P+ zip available on skank.i2p will sometimes fix this if it's date stamped after the update to vanilla.
As for "corrupt" downloads, if you're in the middle of an update when a new version is uploaded, your download will become corrupted, in which case re-downloading the update should fix. It shouldn't happen for release updates very often, slightly more chance when updating from the /dev/ path as that's sometimes updated several times a day.
NotQball wrote
Reply to I2P+ 2.6.0+ released! by z3d
http://skank.i2p/installers/i2pinstall_2.6.0+.exe inside i2p+ also fails on Motrix error 19: If name resolution failed. Similar with other down-loaders including browser.
I2P: 2.6.0-0+ API: 0.9.63 Wrapper: 3.5.51 Built by: dr|z3d Platform: Linux amd64 6.8.9-1kaisen-amd64 Processor: coreibwl Skylake Core i3/i5/i7 [Jcpuid version: 3] Java: N/A 21 (OpenJDK Runtime Environment 21+-adhoc.nixbld.source) Jetty: 9.3.30.v20211001 Servlet: Jasper JSP 2.3 Engine (3.1) JBigI: Native BigInteger library libjbigi-linux-coreibwl_64.so loaded from resource [version: 4] GMP: 6.1.2 JSTL: standard-taglib 1.2.0 Encoding: UTF-8 Charset: UTF-8
sha256sum i2p+ torrent downloaded: 736f38a5ac5121d33b7576cb1f61e6a9b5a28008b82795fdb31c7fb00dfd9b56
sha512sum i2p+ downloaded:
898866b715e8a32cd87d559a61d48b0d5c644d695807389f0d02bc87561cd949771e09c926df248cb422ca99b78c16dc70d375b2f64c42b4d3d70f631f29d29d
NotQball wrote
Reply to I2P+ 2.6.0+ released! by z3d
Some (all that I tried) of the downloads from Gitlab fail on bad header. You can see that on Motrix (error 22) and other secure down-loaders... Maybe just a fluke. Example: https://gitlab.com/i2pplus/I2P.Plus/-/jobs/artifacts/master/raw/i2psnark-standalone.zip?job=Java8
NotQball OP wrote
Reply to Motrix Download Manager works with I2P by NotQball
Nix OS Dutch Fart: If you try to download Nix OS (https://nixos.org/download/#) with Motrix you get error 22 (https://github.com/agalwood/Motrix/wiki/Error#22).
With sugar on top: Ass do, bliss (please in Dutch), fix it! I mean like in the next 2 weeks... Yes you are hacked!
z3d OP wrote
Reply to comment by privacy_is_dead in I2P+ 2.5.1+ released! by z3d
You shouldn't need a flatpak solution, installation isn't complex. The only dependency for installation is a Java installation, openjdk-{version}-jdk-headless
on Linux normally works fine and should be available in your repos.
Once you've got Java installed, downloading an installer for I2P+ and then running java -jar ./i2pinstall.exe
or whatever the name of the download is will launch the graphical installer. Running ~/i2p/i2prouter start
post-installation (assuming you installed to ~/i2p/
) should start the router and launch the console in your browser. Additional instructions available on skank.i2p.
privacy_is_dead wrote
Reply to I2P+ 2.5.1+ released! by z3d
Hello!
I'm new to all this. I installed I2P from flathub here: https://flathub.org/apps/website.i2pd.i2pd
Is there going to be a flatpak for the newer I2P+ to make it easy for newbies to use? Would you recommend I switch to the java-based solution here?
z3d OP wrote (edited )
Reply to I2P+ 2.5.2+ released! by z3d
An issue with 2.5.2+ has been identified and fixed in the latest release and dev updates and the installer on skank.i2p and i2pplus.github.io.
The issue manifests as a gradual loss of peer connections and floodfills. This was due to the temporary blocking of peers sending unsolicited NetDb store requests. Updating to the latest version (2.5.2-11+) is recommended.
Reference: git.skank.i2p/i2pplus/I2P.Plus/commit/65a4606e1c29a45cf50a661b0ac2c6d93bc977bf
NotQball wrote
There will be cross interference from other extension for permission to read the url even with container tabs enabled. I think it is a nightmare project and you'll lose plenty of time and make lots of enemies. Good luck!
righttoprivacy OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by NotQball in I2P Under Attack By Zombie Routers by righttoprivacy
True on few being uninitiated on the network itself... Videos goal is to help new, never tried it before users into checking out I2P.
Ramble also showing up search engines / clearnet as ramble.pw. Video like this might let a user know "it's not broken, it's under attack". That's why I shared it here, while most users may already know this.
For a while there had trouble updating my i2p blog. Now, network working much better for me, without issue lately (running I2P+ 2.5.1-0+)
z3d OP wrote
Reply to comment by NotQball in I2P+ 2.5.1+ released! by z3d
Due to the recent network attacks, prior to rolling out mitigations I2P+ may have presented some issue for some due to the extra-aggressive Sybil detection/banning implementation. This should now be resolved. Please let me know if you're still experiencing issues.
NotQball wrote
Reply to I2P+ 2.5.1+ released! by z3d
I had major problems with i2pplus. The good news is that standalone snark 2.5.0 is working well with my current setups.
DcscZx5idox wrote
righttoprivacy wrote (edited )
Nice - Another I really like is Netsurf: https://www.netsurf-browser.org/
But may have to check this one out for fun.
Example: lower resource devices like Pinephone / single board computers, these lightweight options can be quite nice.
Another one that has comparable features to firefox (and its own options) is Falkon: https://www.falkon.org/
As someone who ran i2p browsing set up on (original / beta) Pinephone as main phone for a few years (til screen broke), finding something lightweight enhances pinephone user experience quite a bit, compared to FF ( ram hog).
Thanks for sharing this new option (new for me anyway). :)
NotQball wrote
Reply to I2P Under Attack By Zombie Routers by righttoprivacy
For his situation it is a wonderful idea. For me it is a terrible ideea. I doubt that you want to be in his shoes at the current time. Go see a Taylor Swift concert or watch House of Russia. Very few uninitiated on this network.
righttoprivacy OP wrote
Reply to I2P Under Attack By Zombie Routers by righttoprivacy
Take a look at latest post by IDK - at the moment suggesting turning off Sybil banning and latest dev release has this. Until updating, good idea to turn it off to help stabilize network: https://www.reddit.com/r/i2p/comments/1cdprxg/network_weather_update_still_stormy_suggested/
NotQball wrote
Reply to BitChan v1.3.0 has been released by sujoro35
http://waycuw2c27ruakfblkf5tcegwmt3ot445dlfoypil6bzmm4yxg7a.b32.i2p/ The idea is that it will work as specified on the above site. You have the info there and maybe it does work. A Wikipedia page would be ideal. I wonder what school did the poster attend... it is too late for me.
NotQball wrote
Reply to BitChan v1.3.0 has been released by sujoro35
https://groups.google.com/g/mail.cypherpunks/c/HrW4yzTICqU
Some explanations/screen-shots would be nice. If I somehow I spent days on it and I found it less desirable than expected, you would might bite your tongue. There is a great oportunity to create the Wikipedia page for BitChan if you have that much time on your hands. To many questions to ask...
righttoprivacy wrote
Reply to I2P+ 2.5.0+ released! by z3d
Always a good day seeing a new I2P+ update <3
Rambler wrote
Reply to I2P+ 2.5.0+ released! by z3d
Good work!
Meow wrote (edited by a moderator )
Reply to I2P+ 2.7.0+ Released! by z3d
I2P 2.7.0 has also been released.