Recent comments

Rambler wrote

While CNN is most certainly garbage, MSM in general and the advent of the 24/7 news cycle is nothing more than news entertainment. They all report the same thing, with only a slight variation in tone or what aspects of an event/story/whatever are emphasized to best cater to their slightly different audience than a different network reporting the same.

Whether you're on the right or you're on the left, MSM is cancer. The right hates CNN, the left hates Fox. Both are garbage.

1

rmlrml wrote

It's very much about being comfortable offline. But the last two sections, "Surfing the Entire Internet with Your Digital Fortress" and "Using Your Digital Fortress to Communicate with Others", are about using alternative networks, and are short, easy reads (although they link to the author's other pages on the topics).

1

TallestSkil wrote

The trick is to never learn JavaScript (or have post-traumatic stress from the professor who taught it to you such that you don’t remember it), and therefore you won’t be ABLE to code a website with bad JavaScript. It’s the perfect solution.

Joking (am I?) aside, you’re obviously right. What we need to fight back is a browser explicitly designed to destroy all tracking mechanisms. And not just the obvious ones. For example, wipe all loaded websites of the ability to track cursor location and page scroll depth. Automatically erase all HTTP referrers from every single link so websites have no idea where you came from when you got to a specific page (make them think you manually typed in the URL every time). Oh, and the big one:

A WEBSITE SHOULD ONLY BE ABLE TO SEE COOKIES FROM ITS OWN DOMAIN. IT SHOULD NEVER HAVE ANY CAPABILITY WHATSOEVER TO EVEN SEE A RANDOMIZED, ANONYMIZED HASH OF WHAT OTHER COOKIES ARE ON THE DEVICE. When I heard that browsers just let any website see any other website’s cookies, I was so fucking appalled that I couldn’t put it into words. The mere idea of such a security flaw never even occurred to me, yet it’s literally common practice in browsers.

7

RAMBLE1 wrote (edited )

cleaner directory, that is sortable by category of eepsite?

What directory are you talking about ?

You can customize your home page from here : http://127.0.0.1:7657/confighome

Other than that I dont see what you're talking about.

Or maybe you mean something like notbob or identiguy that we could filter through categories ?

Me I'd like to see a website like these above that would display the description of the eepsites. I think that would be useful.

2

onion wrote

Reply to comment by burnerben in Update: Cinch News by burnerben

It's hard to believe it's real, but I'm guessing it is. I tried to find the Discord but I couldn't find it. So you must have stumbled on some private Discord. It would be weird for them to be staying "in character" in their own private chat even to the point of blocking you. If they were right wing people making fun of the left, the chat would probably be full of right wing stuff. If it's a joke, they're impressively committed to it.

2

Wahaha wrote

I tried but didn't make much progress reading this article. Possibly because the background color hurts my eyes. Or maybe because of the poor structure that suspiciously looks like a few walls of text glued together.

What I gathered was that the grand name is just describing a computer that isn't plugged into the Internet? But then I didn't figure out the why's and how's. Maybe someone can fill me in.

0

Wahaha OP wrote

Not the best writeup in the world, but further down there's some handy shortcuts for the terminal, which some of them I didn't know yet. Also, just using something like ranger or nnn will make manually typing anything like cp or mv completely obsolete. Ranger also has an easy way to create symlinks and a bunch of other nice features. Definitely the superior way for managing files.

2

takeheart wrote

You're right, jewmmy conveniently keeps quiet about airstrikes, and simply uses Gaza's response to troll @jeremycorbyn with usual antisemitic bullshit to advance his own corporate interests at guardian (pretty much the only source allowed at jewkipedia for the purpose of heavily censored https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel_articles ), and to earn another $1000000 israel blood money. The linked article was also changed in favor of jewmmy https://web.archive.org/web/20180812220404/https://mondoweiss.net/2018/08/wikipedia-suggests-antisemite/

1

takeheart wrote

“we are one foot away from 1984.” After a moment, though, he offers a sizable qualifier: “I never actually read the book, so I don’t know all the themes of the book."

What a dumb fuck. If you read you'll see that murrica stepped over it in the mid 70, and now is way beyond. At least for party it was all about power, not about raping children, mass murdering people and burning down villages on the other end of the globe or worshiping satan.

4

liminal OP wrote (edited )

Upboat because you are the only one who replies to my posts. I see you have read the article carefully, but I'm pretty sure the part about migrant routes isn't realistic, ICE will find the tech more useful than any NGO, although you probably think ICE is on Soros' payroll.

I see a lot of neutered 'facts' in the middle of overton window

What do you mean? My take is that the use of this form of fingerprinting mechanism is worrying, especially when a huge share of all satellites in orbit is controlled by a manchild.

2

takeheart wrote

safeguarding individual rights and freedoms in an open internet

So much euphemisms and lies. They don't want any transparency nor accountability on what govts and corpos do, only on those things that can harm the population. Copyright primarily benefits those in power, independent creative individuals hate it http://verisimilitudes.net/2019-11-30

1