Recent comments

BlackWinnerYoshi wrote

Here's an alternative news source: "Linux Mint team wants users to upgrade, may enforce some" from gHacks (clear net only)

Anyway, I don't like where Mint is going, and here's why: in this blog post, the Mint developers said they may enforce some users to update.

In some cases the Update Manager will be able to remind you to apply updates. In a few of them it might even insist.

So I feel like that it's all downhill from there for Mint. I mean, Mint also had systemdestroy since Mint 16 "Petra", stopped supporting 32-bit processors since Mint 20 "Ulyana", and it's probably also bloated, given it's based on Ubuntu. The LTS version, but still.

2

Rambler wrote (edited )

Reply to by alltimelow

Loopholes like this don't really exist. No, "Woops, you're right. Looks like they forgot to cross their T's and dot their I's... right this way Sir... I mean, Mr. President."

Biden will get 25th'ed, we'll have Kamala until 2024, then we'll see. That's my take.

2

BlackWinnerYoshi wrote

If this won't make Gab users leave this platform, I don't know what will. I mean, they have already gave their data to Goolag reCRAPTCHA, and of course, the developers won't bother with fixes (clear net only). It looks like Goolag reCRAPTCHA isn't there, but I might be wrong. Gab is also Clownflared, which is a privacy issue (clear net only), so even if the privacy policy (clear net only) said anything about storing user data, Clownflare will store it anyway.

6

Rambler OP wrote

So, I never received an email from Gab nor does their website disclose a hack.

If private data was comprised, then fuck Gab for failing to notify users of this breech.

Also, the title is just copied from the article. Anytime i've logged in its just Bible quotes and Trump clips. If thats "far right" then, well, I don't know.

4

Wahaha OP wrote

Hm... maybe it helps to know that the list only goes down to the 1920s, so you already got half the set. Also, I'm interested in how people would answer this with incomplete information, so not having enough data points is so that everyone's answers can be different. Just go with the first thing that comes to mind.

1

smartypants wrote (edited )

Not enough data points.

And I am a person who subscribed to five different filmmaking,cinematographer,producer,SFX magazines and a few exotic underground film quarterlies for 25 years.

I looked for letters , vowel patterns, us soil release date months, box office takes, runtimes, amount of CGI, etc.

Not enough datapoints for me. And as a logician, i disregard 1960s and 1960s as possible empty sets in the above puzzle, and possible red herrings, though in most IQ oriented test corpus questions, the blanks are meant to not be null sets (WISC-R Full Scale, WISC-IV extended, Stanford-Binet, WPPSI-III, etc). Null sets as part of a puzzle are not considered valid in a open ended answer, and only used in multiple choice answers.

1

BlackWinnerYoshi wrote

I don't know how I would complete this, but let's see how GPT-2 would:

1970s — Star Wars
1966 — Superman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Star Wars
1966 — Star Wars
1966 — Superman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Superman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Batman
1966 — Batman

...not what I expected, really. Maybe GPT-3 would do better, but come on, I don't want to join the private beta just for this.

1

Wahaha OP wrote

Reply to comment by spc50 in Normal day in Japan by Wahaha

Mostly to get attention. There are maid restaurants, but the girls working there will only wear the dress inside. The girls wearing stuff like that outside are most likely doing cosplay. Which means to dress up as someone and maybe have strangers take pictures of you.

1

Wahaha OP wrote

Reply to comment by Kalchaya in Permaraped by Wahaha

There's a different perspective and that is that girls are basically like dogs. Some call them perpetual children. What it means is that they need someone that keeps them in check: a man.

It's not a coincidence that women are never responsible for anything under feminism and that it's always the nearest guy they blame. There's actually some truth to that.

You might want to read the manual for some insights into this perspective: https://ramble.pw/f/4chan/2621/manual-to-women

1