Recent comments
Kalchaya wrote
Reply to Firefox 86 Introduces Total Cookie Protection by Rambler
Oh joy...Mozilla has figured out how to do what 'Self-Destructing Cookies' addon was brilliantly doing for years, before they sabotaged the addons en masse? Well ain't that special!
Kalchaya wrote
Reply to comment by Toxicant in RIP Internet Privacy. In effort to combat "disinformation", your digital finger print may be tagged to every image you create or share in the near future. by Rambler
Try MX Linux:
https://v2.incogtube.com/watch?v=FFrG7FAeQ-A
I found it to have slightly more intuitive layout than Linux Mint, which required less searching to find what I needed. For example, I was easily able to figure out how to ditch the gawd-awful Firefox, and replace it with Waterfox...I have yet to successfully do the same in Linux Mint.
Kalchaya wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Linux devices have a unique identifier called machine-id. Here is how to change it. by Rambler
Kalchaya wrote (edited )
Reply to Mozilla beefs up anti-cross-site tracking in Firefox, as Chrome still lags on privacy by Rambler
All these 'improvements' were done (and done better) via "Self-Destructing Cookies' addon, and 'Flush Flash' app. I don't know if Firefox/Mozilla is any better than Chrome/Google, but if there is a difference, it ain't much of one. Rather like trying to decide which TLA is the least obnoxious. Mozilla has a long and nasty history:
Kalchaya wrote
Reply to Reddit removed privacy OptOut settings "to reduce confusion" (Content as comment within for those who don't want to visit reddit) by Rambler
Considering Reddit is now a den of commies, socialists and leftist-libtards...I applaud any move to make their lives a little more bleak....whether that grief comes from within or without.
spc50 wrote
The nerve of Google (read this carefully):
The judge demanded an explanation “about what exactly Google does,” while voicing concern that visitors to the court’s website are unwittingly disclosing information to the company. “I want a declaration from Google on what information they’re collecting on users to the court’s website, and what that’s used for,” Koh told the company’s lawyers. The case is Brown v. Google, 20-cv-03664, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).
---> cause the Court's own website is bugged with Google tracking bullshit.
spc50 wrote
Reply to Normal day in Japan by Wahaha
Okay, so why do they dress this way?
(not that I am complaining)
spc50 wrote
Reply to comment by Kalchaya in Phone faraday bags. Anyone use one? What do you use and how/when do you use it? by Rambler
I have one... and not real thrilled that I do. Smartyfone that is.
I mainly have it just for text / secure messaging and keeping track of of things (read monitoring, security, shipments, etc.).
It mainly lives on wifi only.
More and more I am dividing into two devices though. One that does the internet connecting and 4G... and one that is free of the overt spyware and only wifi... Might opt for something like a rooted Asus Transformer model tablet for this.
Only time I am face glued is in limited sips in the day... infrequent... Winding down pre sleep, yeah, transition from workstation to putzing around via phone.
I really try to use the portable devices for productive things. I swear.
Kalchaya wrote
With all the easily available info floating around on all the ways pocketphones invade your privacy (and basically violate your rights), I'm at a loss to explain why nearly everybody has one superglued to his/her paw....an adult pacifier for Peter Pans?
I have never had one; don't expect I ever will. Not being on a short leash when I leave home is no big detriment, but not having a answering machine to screen calls would be. Having to wait til I get home to make calls or return call is no inconvenience. I guess from what I've seen, its an effective little pocket-toy to waste time with, but given the high price (money, privacy, and nuisance of constantly being yapped at) I'd say the cost far outweighs the benefit.
spc50 wrote
Reply to Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
(popcorn)
Ya'all are too damn bright to go the ad hominem attack route.
Just saying. Merits to both sides and reason to have distros with and without certain things.
spc50 OP wrote
Reply to comment by BlackWinnerYoshi in Windows actually better at something that Linux major distros by spc50
Won't catch me near Windows. If I could get it all out of my LAN I gladly would :)
Left using it back in the XP days. Quite an ugly and counter-intuitive OS on desktop. Probably same boring Windows on the Server side though.
spc50 wrote
So incognito still tracks everything.
Google says they tell you that in voluminous Terms that no one reads and most are incapable of understanding.
How about simplifying this. Law... Precedent...
Terms of Service --- must declare everything. If Terms are longer than one page in length, they are undecipherable and therefore illegal.
You can't claim contract or agreement through deception.
Saying people knowing agreed is utter tripe. They and the brethren in Silly-con Valley have created this low IQ, inability to focus and unwillingness to read form of blind trust.
Time we declare the Trust illegally formed, the contracts done under deception, and hold these people liable for damages.
We want our reparations. Time for victims of the tech slave plantation to revolt.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by smartypants in Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
Hmm yes, totally not a post showing that you're just an angry Linux fanboy trying to defend something that hurts you.
systemdestroy DOES make Linux less free because you're dealing with big corpo software, and it DOES make Linux owned by big corpo because init systems plays an important part to do anything.
No, I won't click the video to "learn". I'm not even going to talk about the fact that you didn't use Invidious as the proxy for NotYourTube.
Also, I'm educated, that's why I know the reason behind systemdestroy being the most used init system: it's because this is a big corpo software. It takes no effort for a big corpo to make something that becomes a dependency for 99% of things to then start harming it and therefore harming the things it has a dependency for.
Also, yes, that Without Systemd site is dead. However, there is an archival link from Wayback Machine, which, GUESS WHAT, allows archiving websites to cite them in future, even if the original site is long dead, so your "argument" doesn't make sense. Also, no, it's not written emotionally, the original author, whoever that was, written this wiki in good faith.
Also, you know, even if the bugs were fixed...
...there are other things that technically aren't bugs, but they still make your life inconvenient. Of course, you being a Linux fanboy, and probably even a freetard, makes you not notice those things, even though you should.
Also, unprofessionalism is actually a valid point; why would you say that the Journal File Format is stable since 26, but then take it back on version 44?
Doesn't it work like that?
Does it, freetard?
Yes, I did read that link. And yes, those launchd operating systems did make a mistake: switching to launchd, which is an init system owned by Apple, the big corpo. Seriously, every open source software owned by a big corpo has problems such as:
- threatening one who was daring to stand up to them (clear net only):
Kay Sievers and Lennart Poettering often have the same response style to criticisms as the GNOME developers [read other Red Hat developers] — go away, you’re clueless, we know better than you, and besides, we have commit privs and you don’t, so go away.
-
"no abuse" (clear net only) unless we abuse (tilde club clear net mirror, Tor v3 mirror, Tor v2 mirror, Freenet mirror, I2P mirror), otherwise known as doublespeak, and also disrespecting contributors
-
Jesus Christ, just Mozilla. I think they're a perfect example of a big corpo that only does harm. Thesis is available on Dig Deeper
Not understanding computers 101?
Absolutely. I'm laughing at you.
Also, maybe that link doesn't mention RAID, but do you know what it mentions? Checksums.
systemd might have won by fucking our arses, however, me and other people that actually think will go against it by using and recommending Linux distributions that don't use systemd, such as Salix OS
Linux servers/desktops might use systemd, but the faster booting is just the placebo effect, which is caused by a disease you have: freetardism.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
Looks like people hold a very strong opinion on systemd.
It's all I know, so I'm going to experiment with alternatives for now.
Rambler wrote (edited )
I think Android, or at least Samsung devices do this too. I don't recall resetting my home network but but if I recall correctly, even resetting the device or changing it with the same SSID and password will result in you having to re-authenticate to use the network, even if the details are the same.
I've got a friend who does Windows networking for offices, local factories, etc. He's dabbled in Linux and tried to convince me to get my Windows certs some time back because "networking just works" with Windows.
He may be right, I wouldn't know. But for the cost of licenses and software used it better work out of the box.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by smartypants in Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
It's still bloated as fuck and avoidable.
smartypants wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
I can still tell you are not an engineer and also did not watch my video link.
All the linux world now has finally switched to systemd!
Systemd nearly default everywhere!:
- Arch Linux - October 2012 switched to Systemd
- CentOS - July 2014 switched to Systemd
- CoreOS - October 2013 switched to Systemd
- Debian - April 2015 switched to Systemd
- Fedora - May 2011 switched to Systemd
- Linux Mint - June 2016 (v18.0) switched to Systemd
- Mageia - May 2012 switched to Systemd
- Manjaro Linux - Nov 2013 switched to Systemd
- openSUSE - September 2012 switched to Systemd
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux - June 2014 (v7.0) switched to Systemd
- Solus switched to Systemd
- SUSE Linux Enterprise Server - October 2014 switched to Systemd
- Ubuntu - April 2013 (v13.04) soon mandatory
- Apple (launchd, the thing systemd copied)
Hurray for progress!
smartypants wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by BlackWinnerYoshi in Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
nothing systemd does makes linusx less free, or corporate owned.
watch the video link i offered and learn something.
you sound deranged and not educated on why systemd won and is now in all linux.
your one dead link is practically a parody of itself based on emotion, not modern facts.
That archive of a dead site is a list of emotional screeching about bugs.
bugs long since patched.
it also includes "Unprofessionalism" as the reason.
Unprofessionalism?
What the ever loving fuck?
Did you even read that link? If so, tell me a reason all those operating systems made a mistake in switching to Apple's launchd (systemd).. i bet you cant find a logical reason that stands up.
Ignorance of fundamental operating system concepts?
laughable linked examples.
in fact the link does NOT cover RAID at all :
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-February/028514.html
That example only discusses turning off journal control of a binary log file. And everything discussed is 100% factual by Lennart Poettering, but not the means or meachanisms entirely. For example a journalled atomic file system only protects VOLUME BITMAP and FILE SEGMENT SPANS and STATE OF FILE... not CONTENTS of data. FS_NOCOW on or off has no relevance on CONTENTS of a crashed log other than its possible new spans, and even then, those, if not flushed, would not be on disk anyways, and as Lennart Poettering stated... it uses its own sanity checksums to detect corrupt logs and to restart a missing log :
https://systemd-devel.freedesktop.narkive.com/lCPb8KVG/announce-systemd-219
Anyways that section has NOTHING to do with RAID.
Launchd/SYSTEMD won the battle, and is now 98% of all linux servers and desktops
98% of linux servers and desktops use the modern and wonderful launchd, and boot far faster as a side-effect.
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
Reply to The Clamper | Old Tool Reborn by dontvisitmyintentions
Wow.
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
Reply to Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
May I humbly suggest pacman -Syu
rather than doubling up the y
? Here's a forum post about yy
: Arch Forum Post (clear net).
It's ironic. Over the last 10 years or so, I've switched from the Ubuntu-based Linux Mint to Arch, and I used Debian for many years prior. Yet, I really can't think of any specific tips. The Arch Wiki is first class, and I just refer to that whenever attempting something new. Honestly, I switched to Arch simply because the Wiki was so good.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by smartypants in Phone faraday bags. Anyone use one? What do you use and how/when do you use it? by Rambler
...I think you forgot that we're on Ramble. We don't search for Amazon links or whatever to then slap the arses of the original post.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by smartypants in Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
No, you're the one who's stupid. systemdestroy is used purely for big corpos to take over Linux, which is unacceptable if we want a free operating system. Please read arguments against systemd (clear net only) and stop trying to push us into using a thing that only does harm and endangers Linux. Really, you can live your entire life with SysV, for example. It doesn't try to harm you.
Wahaha wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by smartypants in Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
Hurr, durr, trust the scientists.
https://ramble.pw/f/funny/2583/i-m-a-scientist-you-can-trust-me
Systemd is bloat. That's what it is.
smartypants wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Best resources to learn more about Arch? by Rambler
I can tell you are not an engineer AND that you did NOT watch that video that 700,000 people watched.
Systemd won, and all linux switching to it.
Only low IQ fools tried to stop its complete take over.
I do not need to look at your links, because all the operating systems and all the educated people sanely switched over.
WATCH THE GODDAMNED VIDEO i linked to. watch it all.
Kalchaya wrote
Reply to The Solution to Tech Tyranny by spc50
I prefer the electric chair....much more painful, doesn't always kill on the first try, and watching sparks shoot out the eyeballs is way more entertaining than a rolling head.