You would have to make the browser engine run through the Tor proxy (socks5://127.0.0.1:9050), including DNS requests to resolve onions. But why no one forked Tor? It's probably because Firefox and its Gecko browser engine aren't dead yet, but it might be in the future, so it's probably a good idea to use Pale Moon as a replacement, especially with the Proxy Privacy Ruler, which allows for applying the proxy only for private windows and/or certain domains. But they'll probably not do that and just accept to use Chromium and its Blink browser engine (I mean, Pale Moon is bad... but it's still better than what Chromium is trying to do).

Is there a way to transplant the Tor protocols onto a different browser engine? Say, WebKit? Why hasn’t anyone forked Tor as a result of their behaviors?

Phrasing it like that makes me wonder what a village full of pedophiles would look like.

Isn't it run by the FBI anyway?

Clearly, there are worse things the Tor Project did, such as removing a Clownflare discussion (notice how it doesn't exist on GitLab) and moving from Trac to GitLab, which caused disabling anonymous contributions. And let's not forget the Mozilla dependency…

Looks like a plain old copyvio: https://www.concrete-online.co.uk/chinese-censorship-tank-man-sold-to-chinese-firm/ After all, once you believe the right of people to see and share images is "property", how can you object to China?

the need for speed

disappointing.

Especially since DuckDuckGo mostly relies on Bing for its results. All search engines suck, of course, but the best choice for now is searX.

CuckCuckShlomo is no good, either.

They show it now, including reports that Bing blocked it at the top. I bet some intern fat-fingered the country list.

duck duck go all the way

Edit: i stand corrected.

Let Microsoft know you care: https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=tank+man

Uh… no? You don’t get it at all.

Well if that's so, you could take 100,000 Computer Professionals from all the top companies on Earth ... and you'd find they're 100.000% "Jewish".

That sounds like the classic "this isn't child porn ... it's just a natural number in base two."

Any sources to read up on that?

SInce 2017 for their Animojis, lots of links. But now in 2021 they use pupil and gaze track to dim screen, and encode 3d faces to cloud. They call the 30,000 plotted 3d pixels... NOT A PHOTO in court documents, when they can be trivially used to make a accurate photo from the 30,000 plotted points.

SInce 2017 for their Animojis, lots of links. But now in 2021 they use pupil and gaze track to dim screen, and encode 3d faces to cloud.

They did, often since 2017, scan faces for 30,000 data points in 3d FOR EMOTION TRACKING in Animojis in 2017 and later, but now in 2021 they do it on home screen and measure pupil and study gaze direction.

Learn and read. Lots of links support all I just typed.

A connected device keeps scanning you and your surrounding (and no mean to switch it off according to posts in apple forum) ... it sounds dodgy as. If Apple isn't spying on its users, it is not yet.

Imagine being so fucking jewish that you believe anything you described is moral, legal, or even remotely acceptable from a business perspective.

lol no, they don’t do that.

partly admits

They admitted nothing. It’s not happening. You’re just libeling.

ive been sucked into their ecosystem for so long idk if i can get out of it