Recent comments in /f/Politics
spc50 wrote
Reply to Eighteen state AGs urge Biden to reverse cancellation of ICE operation targeting sex offenders by Rambler
FUCK this guy... UNCLE HAIR SNIFFER.
Out protecting the illegal invader sex offenders now? This guy is the worst.
Heels up Harris waits in the wings. Remember people, it's 4 years. One term. One and done.
PS: Jeffrey Epstein isn't dead.
spc50 wrote
Reply to Joe Biden Tells Letterman About Getting Arrested at 21 For Breaking Into The United States Capitol by dontvisitmyintentions
Arrested... Development.
This guy has a very long record of being a serial liar.
Rambler wrote
Reply to Joe Biden Tells Letterman About Getting Arrested at 21 For Breaking Into The United States Capitol by dontvisitmyintentions
"Well thats (D)ifferent."
spc50 OP wrote
Well, the entire school board resigned.
We need a lot more of this!
RoboGoat2000 wrote
Reply to by burnerben
Agreed. Anyone that thinks censorship of any form is acceptable can choke on a bag of dicks.
BasedPatriot wrote
Reply to by Wingless
She didn't even take a gun into the capitol from what I saw in the article, they just found some in her house?
When agents searched Powell's home, prosecutors write that they found, "several smashed cell phones," in addition to "firearms paraphernalia." They also found what prosecutors said, "law enforcement described as 'go bags' because they appeared to be prepacked for a forthcoming departure."
I literally keep a go bag or a 'get home bag' in the trunk of my car. I'm not sure how that signifies anything other than preparedness for anything.
Heart wrote
I don't think mod cares about your post.
Default political and news subs should be centralized and appointed mods only should remove irrelevant/duplicate posts (spam).
Those two subs should be guide for new users how much freedom they have on this platform.
burnerben wrote
Reply to by trofa
lmao idk why this is in /f/politics but literally you can see the sky diving banner lmaoooooooooooo
BasedPatriot wrote
Reply to by trofa
In his defense he probably forgot he even said it.
Rambler wrote
Reply to comment by txt in Twitter Bans President Trump, Citing 'Risk Of Further Incitement Of Violence' by awdrifter
I despise trump, but I don't think he incited violence. Some of his supporters definitely did, but trump himself didn't.
Exactly.
aero wrote
txt wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Twitter Bans President Trump, Citing 'Risk Of Further Incitement Of Violence' by awdrifter
I despise trump, but I don't think he incited violence. Some of his supporters definitely did, but trump himself didn't.
awdrifter OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Rambler in Twitter Bans President Trump, Citing 'Risk Of Further Incitement Of Violence' by awdrifter
But the sheep keep believing the MSM, there's little hope to change it. Big Tech literally built China's censorship system, they are now using that for their own purpose.
Rambler wrote (edited )
Jesus Christ. I'm not even really a Trump guy but this is insane.
This is literally one of if not the last public archive of his twitter account: https://web.archive.org/web/20210107000120/https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump
Where is the incitement of violence?
Big tech and MSM need to be the focus of people's anger, on both the left and on the right.
awdrifter OP wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Trump deletes tweets after being banned from Twitter [Updated] | Ars Technica by awdrifter
I agree. But I think it's really too late, Trump missed the window to reign in/break up Big Tech. Corporations will be calling the shots and shaping public opinions from now on. Like Armstrong in Metal Gear Rising said "the memes". https://v2.incogtube.com/watch?v=Tbd8VeerVjA
Rambler wrote (edited )
Imagine companies that are so powerful that they can force the most powerful man in the world to self censor. Big Tech is flexing their power in this election to force other politicians to fall in line.
It's bizarre. I didn't even see anything remotely inciteful in the tweets I've seen shared in articles.
Furthermore, I believe he's still banned from Facebook? Big Tech has a left/liberal bias and needs to be put in check. While these are private platforms that 'can do whatever they want', I believe things like Twitter and Facebook have replaced the traditional 'soap box' in the town square. The 1st Amendment should, in my opinion, apply to large non-topic specific platforms.
The better option would be for people to just leave these companies and close their accounts.
The same platforms who have to add 'additional context' to certain topics don't seem to see the need to add 'additional context' to content/videos/tweets that incite violence by the left. It's how a second wave of looting/riots happened in Minneapolis after a black man shot himself in the head, captured on video, but photos/videos of cops at the crime scene was shared on social media with captions about how the cops killed him. Within 8-12 hours the police had published CCTV footage showing the man killed himself, yet the tweets/media/claims by ONE SIDE remained up, and it contributed to more stores being robbed/looted and more violent protests. No, "Additional Context" on that content to state that the man was a "murder suspect running from police who took his own life". If they have the ability to put claims and context on other topics, surely they can do the same when a criminal is refusing orders and charging the police with a knife and gets shot.
In short: Fuck big tech. They control the narrative, always.
notaspook wrote
Reply to by !deleted261
That'd be amazing if he did, but he won't. To be fair the next administration probably won't either.
jack_walking OP wrote
Reply to comment by notaspook in Is there any real chance Trump's lawsuits lead anywhere? by jack_walking
Do you think voter fraud was consistent toward Joe Biden?
notaspook wrote (edited )
I don't think it'll go anywhere. I don't think it can be proven that voter fraud took place. I'm not saying that I don't believe some did, I just don't think it can be proven. We shouldn't use electronic voting machines, we should use paper ballots and in-person voting with ID check like other countries for federal elections. And yeah I know that the concern was over paper ballots ( mail in ones ) but I'm more worried about the machines. Paper ballots are counted with a lot of accountability involved.
I just think both candidates really really sucked honestly.
Rambler wrote
Reply to Kyle Rittenhouse Court Date? by J0yI9YUX41Wx
Not sure. Seems like we'll see more destruction and violence though this summer as relevant cases begin to go to trial.