Recent comments
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by rmlrml in JJ Cale - Magnolia by Rambler
Try again. Invidious crashes often. I have it restarting on a cron every hour.
rmlrml wrote
Reply to JJ Cale - Magnolia by Rambler
502 Bad Gateway
dontvisitmyintentions OP wrote
Reply to comment by TallestSkil in This is the first house to be 3D printed from raw earth by dontvisitmyintentions
And 3D printing in concrete was done years prior to this (https://v2.incogtube.com/watch?v=DQ5Elbvvr1M), so this dirt one isn't necessarily innovative, but both projects make it more likely I will be able to print my own bunker.
dontvisitmyintentions OP wrote
Reply to comment by TallestSkil in This is the first house to be 3D printed from raw earth by dontvisitmyintentions
I love pork dumplings.
TallestSkil wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in This is the first house to be 3D printed from raw earth by dontvisitmyintentions
Oh, sure. I’m fiercely curious about 3D printing houses, particularly out of meaningful materials like a pseudoconcrete, not this dirt that can’t stand up to a tornado. Being able to 3D print insulating pockets of a tough material at personal house scales will be an absolute revolution.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by TallestSkil in This is the first house to be 3D printed from raw earth by dontvisitmyintentions
The result is underwhelming, but the general tech to 'print' houses is pretty cool and like normal 3D printing pretty much all the shapes are possible.
TallestSkil wrote
Cucinella’s practice which is focused on “humane” architecture, a crossover of low and high tech worlds.
Translation: “made up bullshit that doesn’t actually mean a goddamn thing and which serves solely to destroy Western society and objective standards of beauty.”
The aesthetics of this house
It has none. It looks like a pork dumpling.
a beautiful, healthy, and sustainable home
No, no, and no, respectively.
The shape and the external ridges also enable the structural balance of the house.
No, they don’t.
The building is made from 350 12mm layers, and 60 cubic metres of natural materials for an average consumption of less than 6kW.
Wait, it only took 6 fucking kilowatts to run the machine to build this thing? He needs to stop everything he’s doing (because he’s totally shit at it) and focus EXCLUSIVELY on this. This is a goddamn revolution. You get THAT sort of energy savings from building a real house (you know, something that a human being would want to inhabit) and you’ll be a billionaire. That’s the sort of thing that Musk needs to be doing. This guy is going to squander the potential of this tech.
Wahaha wrote
Not sure if I'd call it a house. Looks more like a vacation home. Also wonder what the acoustics are inside.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to Be ungovernable. by Rambler
Is there more context to this?
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by BlackWinnerYoshi in How To Be Anonymous Online — Part II by Rambler
Yeah, that's on me. Usually I'll read, or at the very least skim my submissions.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in How To Be Anonymous Online — Part II by Rambler
Should've dig deeper before sharing then, especially when it's from reddit, where they do shit like censoring the Dig Deeper website, which is a fucking joke for a subreddit that says they help with "Privacy & Freedom in the Information Age". Never mind the subreddit, the entire forum is against privacy. At least they aren't Clownflared and they allow VPNs.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by takeheart in How To Be Anonymous Online — Part II by Rambler
I'll admit, I didn't read the article. Just copied from /r/privacy on reddit.
Rambler wrote
Reply to New fleet of i2pd 0.9.46 routers by DcscZx5idox
How big is the batch? I've not looked at the netstats recently. Not me!
awdrifter wrote
It'll eventually be like China, each country has their own Great Firewall.
WarmPotato wrote
Reply to Ghislane who? by Rambler
Saw this on insta. Facts.
WarmPotato wrote
Creepy af
takeheart wrote
Reply to New fleet of i2pd 0.9.46 routers by DcscZx5idox
Who else? /f/technology/3275/the-mystery-of-as8003-an-ip-space-belonging-to-the-us
div1337 OP wrote
It's an improvement over using Google reCaptcha, at least for now it's not Google (although Google would probably just buy it). Ideally of course our website should be standalone, not loading resources from external sources.
takeheart wrote
Reply to Some things just take a life of their own by Wahaha
Ainz reinvents concorde fallacy, the hard way.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by takeheart in How To Be Anonymous Online — Part II by Rambler
Let's not forget to mention Firefox and DuckDuckGo. Oh, and did I mention that Medium is Clownflared and Internet Archive is shit at trying to view an article on it, forcing you to use Google Cache? It sounds like irony to me.
takeheart wrote
Reply to How To Be Anonymous Online — Part II by Rambler
Brave
ProtonMail
Signal
social media apps
What a joke.
takeheart wrote
hCaptcha turns this model around. When you use hCaptcha, companies bid on the work your users do as they prove their humanity. You get the rewards.
What rewards? Why the fuck do I need to prove humanity to another technological roadblock?
Wahaha wrote
Reply to Bad software sent postal workers to jail, because no one wanted to admit it could be wrong by div1337
I wonder who pocketed the differences.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
I don't trust hCraptcha - their main page has a "Try it out" thing, which embeds hCraptcha over Clownflare, which means BCMA will block the main page after the first load. So it's clear to me they support Clownflare in some way.
Actually, the Stop Cloudflare repository said it's all about money. You can see it on hCraptcha main page:
hCaptcha allows websites to make money serving this demand while blocking bots and other forms of abuse.
The "abuse", of course, will be e.g. users who use Tor and they happen to visit a Clownflared website.
Is that the only issue? Well, it also has the issue reCRAPTCHA has - the user is still forced to solve it, the only thing that changes is who gets your data to abuse it.
Rambler OP wrote (edited )
Reply to Fort Worth Homeowner Who Shot Trooper May Face No Charges: DPS by Rambler
Texas' home defense laws are practically, "Fuck around and find out."
Refusal to adhere to non-lethal force or commands while trespassing when the trespasser knows you're armed allows for the use of deadly force. At night, I think it's just "assume every tresspasser is armed".
Plain clothes cops shouldn't be used too often.