Recent comments
Rambler wrote (edited )
Reply to Biden Administration Urges Supreme Court To Let Cops Enter Homes And Seize Guns Without A Warrant by onion
Will get struck down, as it should. If not for the unconstitutional nature, then for the fact the millions of gun owners would not comply and revolt.
If passed, they'll make the requirements vague enough that confiscation due to mental health could be for anyone and weaponized.
Share a meme of Pepe? Extremist ideologies, unfit for firearm possession. It'd be abused to no end.
Wahaha wrote
The age old problem of hiring henchmen that ain't too stupid to do their job.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to TIP: Reddit will give you an 'invalid password' message sometimes if logging in through Tor. Disable JS and try again, it'll work. by Rambler
Well, reddit over VPN probably works better, unlike 4chan, which doesn't work over Tor, VPN, proxies, or whatever. But still, if you can, delete your reddit account. And uhh, don't be like me, who had to make a second reddit account just because I screwed up my phone, somehow, and I had to factory reset it, therefore losing my two-factor authentication codes. And if you're an EU citizen, make sure you don't use the normal deactivation process. Make sure to back up 2FA!
smartypants wrote (edited )
Reply to We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
I felt sad when I learned it was corrupted lost and down.
I now feel much happier with the world.
I am glad you are back.
smartypants wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Rambler in Buffer overruns, license violations, and bad code: FreeBSD 13’s close call by z3d
I don't really care about that, seems like 4Chan level bickering at that point. I care more about the poor code pushed out.
Me too.
That said, lots of fun memories hanging around some skilled FreeBSD programmers in San Francisco years ago, with me busting their chops.
Their biggest complaint? Any cool driver fixes for "pc platform" USB , Audio, Network Cards, etc was lifted, duped , forked to OpenBSD , etc, then rapidly "stolen" AND COPY-LEFTED with GPL and shoved into Linux with new restrictive headers rubber stamped on all files... and crippled by GPL.
They REALLY really believe in totally free software and puke at hypocritical GPL2 GPL3 etc.
Wahaha OP wrote
Reply to Stupid shit teenagers do by Wahaha
See, there were no kids in the 2010s, so that's why it's missing.
Imperator wrote
Reply to comment by onion in Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
Yeah, Stallman is a hard one to judge. On one hand he´s an ultra-principled free software activist with strong views about things. He has been fighting for software freedom for decades and never compromises on his principles. I´m 95% sure he has some form of autism and is, from what I heard, quite a pain to deal with. I think that the media backlash he got was totally unjustified and people took his comments wildly out of context, something that´s quite easy to do with someone who is as literal and outspoken as him. As far as I´m concerned he´s entitled to holding controversial views - such is the nature of free thought. Provided no laws are broken, of course.
So, no, I don´t think he should be removed for his views and the surrounding controversy. However, I can absolutely imagine that he´s a pain to work and communicate with in daily life. I think that it is fair that the people who work with him frequently have a right to decide whether he´s unwelcoming and whether he´s a good figurehead for the FSF. I´ll copy some stuff from the support letter:
An Unlikely Icon
“Stallman… is a hard man to like. He is driven, often impatient. His anger can flare at friend as easily as foe. He is uncompromising and persistent; patient in both.”
- Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law Professor, democracy activist
I have had 3 lunches, 1 free software event, and 1 long car ride with Richard Stallman and can vouch for Lessig’s view. In that span of time he managed to confront and berate me countless times. He is by far the most disagreeable person I’ve ever met.
Richard Stallman has an often extreme bristliness about him and an intense propensity for confrontation, which can repel many. However, it is this same uncompromising nature that has led to his firm adherence to his principles. Even when his ideas were ridiculed, even when faced with piles of cash to be made in proprietary software, Stallman stayed on the side of software freedom. He has been preaching software freedom since nearly the origin of software and he adheres strictly to his own moral code. That is what has earned the respect and trust of so many concerned about digital liberties.
Once Stallman comes to a logical conclusion on an issue, he sticks by his views, does not matter the outside pressures. This could be his stance on neckties - symbols of corporate subservience, he won’t wear them. Or his stance on pronouns - "they” is always plural though he champions and frequently uses singular gender-neutral pronouns. Or his controversial views on age of consent laws, the term “First Nation,” prostitution, and other incredibly sensitive topics. Stallman will not, cannot keep a view - however unpopular - to himself.
The paradox of Stallman is that while his pointedness and stubbornness leads many to dismiss him as a jerk, his stubbornness and confrontations are actually rooted in his life-long obsession with morality. Though you may disagree, there is ample reason to believe he has come to hold his views from a concerted, rigorous, good-faith effort to be a voice for good in the world.
Ironically, given the smears against him, one of Stallman's core tenets seems to be consent! He has dedicated decades to arguing for free software, which protects computer users from nonconsensual activities being done on their machines (amongst other things). There is plenty of evidence that Stallman consistently applies his values of consent and freedom to romance and other relations. I find the claims that he is an “abuser” and “predator” online particularly misguided.
onion wrote
Reply to Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
I have to wonder whether he might be a pedophile or at least an ephebophile given some of these comments. https://rms-open-letter.github.io/appendix
The allegations that he harassed women are concerning, but at least I didn't see any allegations of sexual assault.
I can see why people would feel uncomfortable working with him, and it might drive some talent away from free software. But the same could be said for any project that has an Antifa member / supporter on the board of directors. That would make some people uncomfortable and drive away some talent too.
I really dislike some of his views but I don't think anyone should be removed for expressing opinions since that leads to self censorship. If he is ever found guilty of some serious crime like sexual assault or possession of child porn, it would make more sense to remove him in that case.
zbviqi OP wrote
Reply to comment by AWiggerInTime in Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
https://vimuser.org/
My eyes crashed! XD
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by onion in The hidden fingerprint inside your photos by Rambler
That's why I kept my old printer from the 1980s or so. Can only print black and white and no bullshit added. Though, these days, I rarely print. Maybe once a year.
AWiggerInTime wrote
Reply to Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
What surprised me is that Leah Rowe signed the support petition.
After the whole drama with stallman and libreboot's withdrawal from gnu, this was the last name I expected to popup on the petition.
onion wrote
Reply to The hidden fingerprint inside your photos by Rambler
I knew about metadata but this was new to me
The different sensitivities of the photosites creates a type of imperceptible image watermark. Although unintentional, it acts like a fingerprint, unique to your camera’s sensor, which is imprinted onto every photo you take. Much like snowflakes, no two imaging sensors are alike.
In the digital image forensics community, this sensor fingerprint is known as "photo response non-uniformity". And it's "difficult to remove even when one tries", says Jessica Fridrich of Binghamton University in New York state. It's inherent to the sensor, as opposed to measures, such as photo metadata, that are "intentionally implemented", she explains.
This is good to know too. I always suspected that printers had something like this.
When considering these privacy issues, we might draw parallels with another technology. Many colour printers add secret tracking dots to documents: virtually invisible yellow dots that reveal a printer's serial number, as well as the date and time a document was printed
onion OP wrote (edited )
I have heard that the Thinkpad X200 is a good laptop for people who want to install libreboot and disable the Intel Management Engine.
This is another article about the IME. It lists libreboot compatible computers
Despite all Intel's efforts to make the Management Engine inescapable, software developers have had some success with preventing it from loading code. For instance, the Libreboot project disables the Management Engine by removing all the code that the Management Engine is supposed to load on some Thinkpad computers manufactured in 2008, including the R400, T400, T400s, T500, W500, X200, X200s, and X200T.
Also, many Intel computers manufactured in 2006 have the ancestor of the Management Engine which is disabled from the start, such as the Lenovo Thinkpads X60, X60s, X60 Tablet and T60, and many more.
https://www.fsf.org/blogs/sysadmin/the-management-engine-an-attack-on-computer-users-freedom
onion OP wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in What FBI Stats Really Reveal About Asian Hate Crimes by onion
It’s an interesting question.
I think the percentage of asian-on-asian violent crime is low partially because asians are commiting less violence in general compared to other races.
Table 12 shows the ratios of offenders to population, and also the ratios of victims to population.
From page 13:
Based on victims’ perceptions of the offenders, the offender-to-population ratio shows that the percentage of violent incidents involving black offenders (22%) was 1.8 times the percentage of black persons (12%) in the population. In contrast, the percentage of violent incidents involving white (50%) or Hispanic (14%) offenders was about four-fifths (0.8 times) the percentage of whites (62%) or Hispanics (17%) in the population, and the percentage involving Asian offenders (2.5%) was about two-fifths (0.4 times) the percentage of Asians in the population (6%).
On page 12 it says the percentage of violent incidents involving asian victims is less than their population.
The victim-to-population ratio varied by race. The percentage of violent incidents involving white (66%) or black (11%) victims was similar to the population percentages of white (62%) or black (12%) persons. About 14% of violent incidents involved Hispanic victims, which was about four-fifths (0.8 times) the representation of Hispanics in the population (17%). Similarly, a smaller percentage of violent incidents involved Asian victims (4%) than the representation of Asians in the population (6%).
The table on page 12 says that the asian population is 6.3%. Aside from asians commiting less violence, I also think that partially because they are a small minority, they are more likely to have interactions with people of other races in daily life and / or live in an area where the population is mostly non-asian. Therefore, there is more potential for violence from someone of another race.
From what I understand, there is tension between the asians and blacks partly because asian stores are seen as siphoning off money from black communities.
But also, for some economically motivated criminals, asians are perceived as being a good/easy target. https://invidious.fdn.fr/watch?v=BMwMtl_gQvA
The funny thing about the narrative that Trump has sparked a wave of white racial hatred against asians is that for reasons you mentioned, among others, it seems like most white supremacists like asians. Actually many of them seem to like asians more than they like most white people, at least the ones I see online anyways.
Rambler wrote
Donenfeld identified numerous problems with Macy's code, but rather than object to the port's release, Donenfeld decided to fix the issues. He collaborated with FreeBSD developer Kyle Evans and with Matt Dunwoodie, an OpenBSD developer who had worked on WireGuard for that operating system. The three replaced almost all of Macy's code in a mad week-long sprint.
A good response.
This went over very poorly with Netgate, which sponsored Macy's work. Netgate had already taken Macy's beta code from a FreeBSD 13 release candidate and placed it into production in pfSense's 2.5.0 release. The forklift upgrade performed by Donenfeld and collaborators—along with Donenfeld's sharp characterization of Macy's code—presented the company with a serious PR problem.
Not a great response.
This combative response from Netgate raised increased scrutiny from many sources, which uncovered surprising elements of Macy's own past. He and his wife Nicole had been arrested in 2008 after two years spent attempting to illegally evict tenants from a small San Francisco apartment building the pair had bought.
I don't really care about that, seems like 4Chan level bickering at that point. I care more about the poor code pushed out.
XANA wrote
Reply to I2P site is back up. by Rambler
Finally I'm back :D
awdrifter wrote
Reply to We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
Glad to see it's back.
vistingghost wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Feature requests: Put them in here. by Rambler
Thanks, nice site!
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by zbviqi in Feature requests: Put them in here. by Rambler
It is now re-enabled.
Unfortunately that feature is out above my ability to complete on my own, but I do like the idea of it. I'll add it to the list regardless.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
rms should be removed from the Freetardist Software Foundation. And preferrably the FSF itself, I absolutely hate it.
zbviqi wrote
Reply to Feature requests: Put them in here. by Rambler
Is disabling signup intended? If no, re-enable it please. Further more, I want anonymous account that can post without login.
zbviqi OP wrote (edited )
Reply to Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
He should not be removed from FSF as far as law permits him. I want to see what he will/can do. Complete Hurd works please! :D
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
Should be able to. If it doesn't, drop me a line and I can at least look into. May not be immediate but I have a to-do list of stuff I work on even if some things are super old on it, haha.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to Why You Should (almost) NEVER Use Lazy Load by Wahaha
For those that need a TL;DR: if you have a CDN, like VanwaTech, you don't need lazy loading.