Recent comments
XANA wrote
Reply to I2P site is back up. by Rambler
Finally I'm back :D
awdrifter wrote
Reply to We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
Glad to see it's back.
vistingghost wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Feature requests: Put them in here. by Rambler
Thanks, nice site!
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by zbviqi in Feature requests: Put them in here. by Rambler
It is now re-enabled.
Unfortunately that feature is out above my ability to complete on my own, but I do like the idea of it. I'll add it to the list regardless.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
rms should be removed from the Freetardist Software Foundation. And preferrably the FSF itself, I absolutely hate it.
zbviqi wrote
Reply to Feature requests: Put them in here. by Rambler
Is disabling signup intended? If no, re-enable it please. Further more, I want anonymous account that can post without login.
zbviqi OP wrote (edited )
Reply to Remove or support RMS? by zbviqi
He should not be removed from FSF as far as law permits him. I want to see what he will/can do. Complete Hurd works please! :D
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
Should be able to. If it doesn't, drop me a line and I can at least look into. May not be immediate but I have a to-do list of stuff I work on even if some things are super old on it, haha.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
Cool, thank you very much. Then I can enable IP spoofing again without running into issues again.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
It may be, I see no specific setting for it on my end. There are some config settings available to whitelist certain IPs, which I have to use so Tor Onion, I2P, Loki network users don't get rate limited since they share the same IP of the network connection they're using...
I can individually whitelist accounts which does: "Whitelisting will allow this user to bypass IP bans and some flood protections. Additionally, their IP addresses will no longer be stored." So I've gone ahead and done that for you, but no sort of global "X posts per 1 hour" type of rule to be set.
IPs are merged automatically on a cronjob schedule anyway for everyone so whitelisting really only prevents you from getting stopped by the spam filter that has no configurable settings anywhere.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to !!! New OpenSSL CVE remotely exploitable !!! by boobs
And of course, LibreSSL is dead in Linux, so were all screwed, I guess.
(also, yes, LibreSSL also has security vulnerabilities, but way less than OpenSSL.)
boobs OP wrote
Reply to !!! New OpenSSL CVE remotely exploitable !!! by boobs
no updates in arch linux yet but somehow it's already been patched in debian stable ... :^)
Wahaha wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by Rambler in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
I think it's more of a global thing. I get three submissions per hour (independent of where I post), after that: https://i.imgur.com/MQ89QxW.png
Thought it's to prevent spam.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
Wait, this happens?
Send me a PM with details if you can and I'll review it further as able.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by BlackWinnerYoshi in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
On a technological level I might agree, but other than that it's just a different experience. Voat didn't limit me to three posts per subverse per hour, like Ramble does. And Voat had some privileges attached to the Internet points you could collect. Above 100 points or so, all restrictions were lifted and beyond that it didn't matter, anymore.
This was a measure against bots and shills. Not sure if it accomplished anything. But since the original Voat is now dead, everything will be better, so there's that.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
At least [RAMBLE] is not Clownflared, doesn't require JavaScript, doesn't limit you to one post per day. You know, it's just better than the now defunct Voat.co.
Wahaha wrote (edited )
Reply to We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
This may not be Voat, but it sure as hell feels like Voat.
Don't stress out too much, if it's down, it's down.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to We're back up! Here is what happened. by Rambler
Okay, now we're back. I posted this prematurely.
boobs wrote
Reply to What's the next, "BitCoin" in your opinion? With so many crypto-coins available now, which ones do you think actually have long term applications for growth similar to the Bitcoin explosion? by Rambler
whoever solves the scaling problems will be the "next" bitcoin.
Rambler wrote (edited )
When I was a student, it seemed like teachers got great satisfaction out of that exchange.
"Can I go to the bathroom?"
-- "I don't know, can you?"
<sighs> "May I go to the bathroom?"
I had 8 classes each day and just pissed between them like a normal person but it seemed like that once per day I'd witness this exchange. It seemed to always give the teachers satisifaction to correct the student and it happened enough that I know when to use "may I" and "can I" in normal discussion for fear of activating some smug look on the other person's face.
dontvisitmyintentions wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in What FBI Stats Really Reveal About Asian Hate Crimes by onion
Maybe they don't report when it can be settled in other ways. "It's Chinatown" is a cliche for a reason.
Rambler wrote
Reply to comment by onion in What FBI Stats Really Reveal About Asian Hate Crimes by onion
Asians are the only demographic shown where the victim and the offender aren't usually the same race.
Ex: White on white violence makes up 62% of violence with a white victim. Black on black violence being 70% of the cause of a black violence victim... Yet Asians, across the board, seemingly are the victim almost equally from the other races. (24% white offender, 27% black offender, 24% Asian offender, 7% Hispanic offender, 14% other.
Asians also have the lowest number of reported violent incidents but I'm not sure if that's due to their population size or not,.
Who are these people hating Asians? They work hard, the have good family values and push their children to be educated and productive members of society. They're good people. If they're in America it's because they left behind a shit hole for a better future and they almost always work hard and achieve the American dream. It's amazing what they're able to achieve in just two generations, from poverty to grandson going to med school and becoming a doctor.
onion OP wrote
See table 14 on page 13 https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv18.pdf
Rambler wrote
Reply to Buffer overruns, license violations, and bad code: FreeBSD 13’s close call by z3d
A good response.
Not a great response.
I don't really care about that, seems like 4Chan level bickering at that point. I care more about the poor code pushed out.