Recent comments in /f/Ramble
burnerben wrote
clearnet for now unfortunately but I'm looking into I2P
RAMBLE1 wrote
From I2P and ramble.i2p is working fine now.
This is awesome af!
Schizo wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Feature Request: Crossposting by nullv
the p2p fediverse is born :)
Shackles2Garlands wrote
Reply to Welcome to [RAMBLE] by Rambler
Great work!
Rambler admin wrote
Reply to Feature Request: Crossposting by nullv
I like this idea.
notaspook wrote
I'm using the I2P access right now. Site works well and seems stable but ramble.i2p still doesn't load yet so i'm using the base32 address instead.
Schizo wrote
I'm using clernet
I'll use tor browser, I'll test i2p but I'm waiting a ZeroNet integration :)
Rambler OP wrote
I'm using the Yggdrasil service now that I'm on another device, it's so fast! http://[200:718d:c499:3fce:c5e:65c6:73d6:f46d]/f/ramble/38/how-are-you-accessing-the-website-clearnet-i2p-site-tor-site
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by xaen in How are YOU accessing the website? (clearnet, I2P site, Tor site, yggdrasil?) by Rambler
I'm glad to see going to the clearnet on the tor browser shows the ".onion available" button.
Glad to hear it. It's a pretty neat feature where you can insert the onion service location in the header.
Nifty little feature for anyone hosting a site that is available on both the clearnet and TOR: https://community.torproject.org/onion-services/advanced/onion-location/
TorAndroidTest wrote
Reply to comment by GnomeChumpsky in How are YOU accessing the website? (clearnet, I2P site, Tor site, yggdrasil?) by Rambler
Now testing with the Tor Android app using the onion site. Last comment was the Tor Android app using the clearnet site.
Test test. Beep boop.
xaen wrote
I'm running in clearnet and tor (on linux), no apparent problems yet with access. I'm glad to see going to the clearnet on the tor browser shows the ".onion available" button.
TorAndroidTest wrote
Reply to comment by GnomeChumpsky in How are YOU accessing the website? (clearnet, I2P site, Tor site, yggdrasil?) by Rambler
Testing, testing. 1, 2, 3.
GnomeChumpsky wrote
Yeah, "Error loading form, Please try again"
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by GnomeChumpsky in How are YOU accessing the website? (clearnet, I2P site, Tor site, yggdrasil?) by Rambler
Interesting. I've got the TOR Android app so I'll create an account with that and test. I know the desktop Tor browser and .onion site with no javascript functions fine.
If all goes well you'll see another comment reply soon.
GnomeChumpsky wrote
Comment replies are broken on Tor browser for ios... but I might be the only person on the planet that uses that.
I learned about l2p today because of this site... so I'll be checking that out.
Rambler wrote
Reply to Feature Request by GnomeChumpsky
Well what I like about the voting system is it's democratic in theory (though there isn't anything stopping you from creating dozens of accounts, realistically) and because it's a decent gauge of what content belongs and doesn't like someone else pointed out.
I'm more likely to look at a link or read something that has hundreds of upvotes on reddit, for example, than I would if it only had 3. And that's a psychological thing that I'm sure sites like reddit are gaming, because it tricks you into thinking, "Wow, this must be good". I guess on our end, you'll just have to trust that we won't game it.
One of the features I love most about our voting system is it's reminiscent of the earlier days of reddit where you see both the upvote and down vote totals. This feature has been removed from reddit since probably 2010-2012 or so. I know Ruqqus has this feature in place and I think Voat may as well. I always thought it was good for perspective of what the actual community using the website though, and that removing them was a step in the wrong direction.
Anyway, do you know why I've called this place RAMBLE yet?
xaen wrote
Reply to comment by notaspook in Feature Request by GnomeChumpsky
IMO straight voting systems are great until botnets start doing there thing and giving one person the votes of hundreds of users. Hopefully they have something to counteract those types ....
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by notaspook in Welcome to [RAMBLE] by Rambler
Yes it does!
xaen wrote
Reply to Welcome to [RAMBLE] by Rambler
Nice work 👍 and Im excited to see how everything goes.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by karate_ti in We're live. by Rambler
Thanks! I hope you can find some enjoyment and that the website serves some sort of purpose for you.
karate_ti wrote
Reply to We're live. by Rambler
Congratulations!
notaspook wrote
Reply to Feature Request by GnomeChumpsky
LOL I kind of like that idea but the vote system is usually pretty good for self moderation. For example, on reddit I know that the good content and comments is under "controversial".
notaspook wrote
Reply to Welcome to [RAMBLE] by Rambler
Site loads fast over the I2P network using http://smv3cryi3n7d5ll7xpvlhstubi5yj4dadeltyrdwdr4onwd2jvvq.b32.i2p/
Good work.
Thehappydoghouse wrote
Reply to How are YOU accessing the website? (clearnet, I2P site, Tor site, yggdrasil?) by Rambler
Clear