Recent comments in /f/Privacy
righttoprivacy wrote
Another self serving pact to provide a dash of extra plausible deniability for spying, chock full of empty promises...
As is the modern day standard. 🙃
righttoprivacy wrote
Facebook: “ 😭 We support giving people more control over how their data is used, but Apple’s far-reaching changes occurred without input from the industry..."
😇
noptic wrote
History says French govt. are actual terrorists.
righttoprivacy OP wrote
Reply to comment by not_bob in Russia Amassing Domestic Surveillance Monitoring For Antiwar Sentiment by righttoprivacy
100%
Mainstream media pushes incessant "darknet" propaganda to paint networks presenting "challenge to monitor users" in bad light (even if intent is innocent).
I see security perks of i2p as another nice aspect that can help gain the right public recognition.
not_bob wrote
This is where things like I2P are key. You can't really hide that you are running I2P either, but you can hide what you are doing on the internet. Unlike Signal, Telegram and such. Since your router routes other people's traffic as well.
not_bob wrote
Reply to comment by righttoprivacy in States haven’t stopped spying on their citizens, post-Snowden - they’ve just got sneakier by Rambler
Cloud storage tends to kill this :(
righttoprivacy wrote
Reply to States haven’t stopped spying on their citizens, post-Snowden - they’ve just got sneakier by Rambler
"new transparency and oversight constraints, together with the growth of encrypted technology, have tilted the balance towards privacy."
Sounds a bit idealistic.
We all should have the basic dignity that is the right to privacy in our homes and personally owned devices (at a minimum).
righttoprivacy wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in French govt. says users of uBlock Origin, Signal etc. are potential terrorists by Rambler
Human autonomy / privacy isn't a threat to anyone... unless that person / power has a thing for totalitarianism. 🙄
not_bob wrote
This is unacceptable!
Rambler OP wrote
not_bob wrote
This is total bullshit. The desire for privacy is not a crime.
9995Deluxe wrote
You don't say.
MiXYsFHYS1tt3St3 wrote
It's the best we've got though. Linus is a total gangster for basically telling us 'yes there is a backdoor, please find it' with his "nooooo" nod.
Would you propose proprietary is better somehow?
Wahaha wrote
I never stopped using self-hosted mail. Been using it for about 20 years now and it works fine for me.
TrophyAnnex wrote
bAd OnLinE bEhAvIoR. you know, the stuff that's existed since what like 2002. Useless research and money spending. Soon they might be monitoring voice chats if they don't already do that
il_douche wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Revealed: US Military Bought Mass Monitoring Tool That Includes Internet Browsing, Email Data by Rambler
Look into I2P.
Less centralization, (no hard-coded directory servers; because on I2P everyone is a directory server) more relays, (everyone is a relay by default) faster than Tor.
Downside: Less exit nodes. I2P is meant for communicating mostly within I2P, not outside. But this can be a good thing, because most of the attacks that the feds use to deanonymize tor users are based upon the user using exit nodes to talk to the regular internet.
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Revealed: US Military Bought Mass Monitoring Tool That Includes Internet Browsing, Email Data by Rambler
Yeah, I don't think Tor is the answer to this issue.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Revealed: US Military Bought Mass Monitoring Tool That Includes Internet Browsing, Email Data by Rambler
Agreed, however, from the same article you have it mentioned that a board member of Tor is also the CEO of the company that sells this data to the US Military / Government.
The Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General, which the whistleblower alleges referred their complaint to the Navy, told Motherboard it had received Wyden’s letter and was reviewing it. The Office of the Naval Inspector General declined to comment and directed Motherboard back to its Department of Defense counterpart.
Beyond his day job as CEO of Team Cymru, Rabbi Rob Thomas also sits on the board of the Tor Project, a privacy focused non-profit that maintains the Tor software. That software is what underpins the Tor anonymity network, a collection of thousands of volunteer-run servers that allow anyone to anonymously browse the internet.
“Just like Tor users, the developers, researchers, and founders who've made Tor possible are a diverse group of people. But all of the people who have been involved in Tor are united by a common belief: internet users should have private access to an uncensored web,” the Tor Project’s website reads.
When asked by Motherboard in April about Thomas’ position on the Tor Project board while also being the CEO of a company that sells a capability for attributing activity on the internet, Isabela Bagueros, executive director for the Tor Project, said in an email that “Rabbi Rob's potential conflicts of interest have been vetted according to the standard conflicts disclosure process required of all board members. Based on the board's understanding of Rabbi Rob's work with Team Cymru, the board has not identified any conflicts of interest.”
spektor wrote
Reply to Revealed: US Military Bought Mass Monitoring Tool That Includes Internet Browsing, Email Data by Rambler
More reasons to develop alternetworks that make this kind of thing more difficult.
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in DHS to Spend Almost $700,000 Investigating ‘Radicalization in Gaming’ by Rambler
That would probably qualify.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in DHS to Spend Almost $700,000 Investigating ‘Radicalization in Gaming’ by Rambler
Like "Angry Goy 2"?
spektor wrote
I think if they examine the relationship between game developers and "extremism" developed in certain games, they will discover that some gaming companies are more likely to produce games that correlate to this kind of activity.
spektor wrote
Since Facebook is a terrible company, you'd think people by now would stop using the damn thing. No. We keep getting articles on how more terrible it is than we thought!
spektor wrote
Sounds like they are increasingly afraid of their own people, eh?
not_bob OP wrote
Reply to comment by righttoprivacy in The Battle for Digital Privacy Is Reshaping the Internet (Published 2021) by not_bob
Facebook cares about it's users!
bows head
And people just hand personal data over right and left ...