it would be great to share b32 address as well

I recall them introducing a new requirement after that incident, that registration should be from a clearnet only. So best you can do is register from random wifi cafe

Not long before this video, Benn Jordan discovered various vulnerabilities in flock safety cameras, leaving few conclusions outside lack of care of the public affected / monitored by these IMHO: https://v2.incogtube.com/watch?v=uB0gr7Fh6lY

It's not hard to at least encrypt the data.

Due to the way I2P works, it's harder to block than Tor. It even works in China. We even had a Chinese "chan" board for a while, but it's gone now. R.I.P. Walled City...

Telegram was always a honeypot too, this was evident by the fact that they required a phone number for signup.

Peer-to-Peer and Dark-Web chat apps with algorithmically generated user IDs that are not tied to an email, phone number, or anything else, are the way.

SimpleX, Session, Briar, and Tox are some good ones. (Careful with tox, it's true peer-to-peer, so it reveals your IP to people you chat with)

Twitter / "X" is an American site, hosted in America, operating under American jurisdiction and American law.

EU law and opinions should be completely disregarded.

what is it about then?

The EU is retarded in so many ways, but whoever wrote this post is even more.

It takes no more than 5 fucking minutes and and two brain cells to understand that this has nothing to do with "free speech" or the US.

Fuck the EU Fuck the US Fuck Musk

But also, fuck you, OP.

I would expect that some European countries will join the Strict Countries list.

Relevant conversation

What effects will this have on i2p?

Imo at first they will ignore i2p, because of its small size. Once the regulations grip the clear-web/ open internet, I estimate in a decade or two, they will give attention to banning/blocking or changing i2p.

PSP

https://secureblue.dev is another project to look at, it has been endorsed by the grapheneos team.

Hey, what do you mean by that?

Privacy in the real world has less to do with buying fancy gadgets and more to do with habits and what kind of clothing you wear.

An few obvious suggestions are that you wear hats and sunglasses when outside, trucker hats are widespread and make you harder to identify, they're a good choice to obfuscate your face while not drawing too much attention, if you wear or use IR devices which will deliberately tamper or make identification harder you will draw a lot of attention, those should be reserved for riots or similar scenarios where confrontation is expected, not for daily use. Along with this suggestion comes another good one of avoiding "eye contact" with surveillance cameras; whenever you enter a public spaces and buildings or a big private business, always assume you're being surveilled, don't look for cameras because if you can see them clearly they can also see your face features, Luigi Mangione got easily identified because he did this exact mistake, multiple times, even though he did try to obfuscate his face.

On the corporates collecting your data to study your purchase habits you can always pay on cash and refuse to pay with a credit or debit card, or a phone, because they (both businesses and banks) will use those transactions to guess your income and how much you spend and where, never buy anything on a business that doesn't accept cash, even if they accept cryptos which I doubt you'll find any, always buy in cash. If a business such as a supermarket offers you discounts with a membership card you can try to cheat the system by providing fake names and identities if they ask for one, if they do not allow an anonymous member card then you can assume those discounts are being paid with your purchase habits and you're giving your consent if you accept them, so reject those discounts at all times if possible.

Another good suggestion and more on the hardcore side is to never, ever tattoo yourself, and if you have tattoos that are on visible places such as arms or legs consider covering them or ideally getting rid of them. Cops love tattoos, because they're akin to fingerprints that can be used to consistently identify people even if they cover their faces.

You make an excellent point. I don't suppose you can just buy glasses or hats with IR illuminators?

Best way to protest it is getting more people on i2p so the network becomes better and faster, get that i2p propaganda torrent and start spreading :]

99% sure that every user of i2p knows this, also this looks like a bot made it.

That sounds about right.

i believe similar laws are introduced only because the current parents are unable to limit their kids computer access. similar laws weren't needed in 90s because everyone's parent taken good care of their kids and limited how much screen time they had. Of Course there are some people who didn't have such parents but everywhere are exceptions. Just since parents don't have time to take care of their kids they just given up on actually parenting then politicians use similar laws as trojan horse to more censorship

heres the circle: corporations want more money so they raise the cost of their products(houses etc...) -> people want to buy such products but dont have enough money for it -> start working in multiple jobs -> not enough time to parent&raise kids -> politicians make laws that censor internet so kids stay safe(in theory) -> leads to censorship, abuse of power, then banning critics -> less regulation for companies passes because people dont know actual the truth -> more money for corporations -> time for another circle?

One thing that I would like to note is that the government(s) is largely content to watch unlawful behavior and do nothing. The law enforcement in one place I used to live used (likely and/or certainly) stingrays (probably) and radars (certainly) to watch people inside their homes. There were plenty of people they could have gone after for various offenses ranging from speeding to drug manufacture, but they rarely used their surveillance capabilities to do anything about those crimes.

In the US, the federal agencies have required the serialization of firearms, the registration of certain firearms, and also keep track of people's credit card purchase history of create a de-facto registry based on what bullets people buy. They would be hard pressed to do anything about firearm ownership in general in that part of the world, but they are keen on tracking what people have to make selective confiscation easier. They may not "come for your guns" unless you give them a reason, such as using medical marijuana or having PTSD. This would allow easing toward a Europe-style government control of all firearms and the death of any guarantee of freedom.

The age verification law in the UK is likely for the purpose of identifying opposition and using zersetzung-style tactics to cracking down on those who oppose them. http://wikiless.i2p/wiki/zersetzung?lang=en In the past they have been content to simply imprison those who organize the opposition.

These laws have nothing to do with protecting children.

It is 100% only about censorship and controlling what every person in a country can say online.

These laws need to be repealed and fought against by every human on earth, or there will be no country worth living in.

if anything, excuse my English, I'm not a native speaker

I'm too lazy to read this huge post, but in general, it's better for children (under 12) not to touch the Internet at all, let them hang out lol.

Cool! Have you tried other Linux distributions?

Made a damn account to say this but Android emulator. Use Android Studio I'm pretty sure nobody looks at this dnb of a forum doe