Comments
spc50 wrote
The nerve of Google (read this carefully):
The judge demanded an explanation “about what exactly Google does,” while voicing concern that visitors to the court’s website are unwittingly disclosing information to the company. “I want a declaration from Google on what information they’re collecting on users to the court’s website, and what that’s used for,” Koh told the company’s lawyers. The case is Brown v. Google, 20-cv-03664, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).
---> cause the Court's own website is bugged with Google tracking bullshit.
smartypants wrote
Court's own website is bugged with Google tracking bullshit.
In 2015 it was fashionable, because Google also gave your site a slight bump in searches on google lookup priority.
In 2021 its retarded to use Google tracking bullshit.
On my most important sites I lifted from bottom 200 to NUMBER ONE SEARCH ENGINE GOOGLE RESULT (meat space retail), I did NOT use any google web track bugs, just lots and lots of various normal SEO tricks, many of my own design.
The best part? I bragged I could bring the bottom 200 site to the top 10, and after one year and number one spot, the manager called me and complained his phones never ever stop ringing from people all over the world calling him, and is there any way I could make only people from his state or county call him!
HAH!
No need to use google web tracking to uplift a retail web site from bottom 200 to number one search result. NO NEED FOR GOOGLE SPY BUGS
If that court page used a paid web designer in 2014... 80% likely they would have got a google tracker slapped on it so the web designer could study his results.
Everyone should rip out google.
spc50 wrote
So incognito still tracks everything.
Google says they tell you that in voluminous Terms that no one reads and most are incapable of understanding.
How about simplifying this. Law... Precedent...
Terms of Service --- must declare everything. If Terms are longer than one page in length, they are undecipherable and therefore illegal.
You can't claim contract or agreement through deception.
Saying people knowing agreed is utter tripe. They and the brethren in Silly-con Valley have created this low IQ, inability to focus and unwillingness to read form of blind trust.
Time we declare the Trust illegally formed, the contracts done under deception, and hold these people liable for damages.
We want our reparations. Time for victims of the tech slave plantation to revolt.