No, you shouldn't use Brave.Comments
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
"It's no secret that Mozilla is a progressive company"
I'm done. F those guys.
mr4channer wrote
gnu icecat, pale moon, ungoogled chromium. brave is crypto miner
[deleted] wrote
mr4channer wrote
lmao, it has built in crypto shit, what else do you need?
spc50 wrote
So how about that Brave :)
A month ago Aspenwu was saying look out.
Rambler posted it.
Then we made this: https://ramble.pw/f/privacy/2387/brave-browser-leaks-your-tor-onion-service-requests-through
Since then Brave continues to graft garbage into their browser. Like putting NEWS reader in it. Thing constantly phoning home ET...
Brave isn't any longer allowed in my environment unless quarantined in contained machine for testing their broken stuff.
Rambler OP wrote
I just found the article interesting and thought it was worth sharing. Brave may be better today, I don't know.
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
Thank you for sharing.
boobs wrote
I don't use brave because it's "good" I use it because firefox is shit and brave is just the next least shit browser.
StreetMix wrote
LMAO the article is retarded. Saying that faggotry is a good thing and FF is more secure.....I guess I do should use Brave after all.
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
In all fairness, faggotry is a good thing.
StreetMix wrote
How so?
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
Near as I can tell, people have no control over the development of their sexual preferences. Some men discover they are only attracted to other men. For those men, faggotry the gateway to some of the deepest and most profound experiences of fulfillment and pleasure available to humans. I want everyone to experience as much joy, pleasure, happiness, and meaning as possible during their short lives. Ergo, faggotry is good.
div1337 wrote
Brave is at the forefront of browser privacy, bringing fingerprinting shield and tor browser to the non-techies and their (upcoming?) p2p protocol will be so awesome.
PwndToaster wrote
"In 2008, he had donated $1,000 to support passing California Proposition 8" Based