hey man im not sure if you have eyes none the less a brain but its not hard to logic that they are more ballots that their bringing out for tomorrow or more counting and because of no audio in the footage it cant be ruled out that they were taking a break. if youd like to show me some solid evidence from credible sources id be happy to discuss.

So your not gonna name specific things with specific sources to back them up? great. i love when people make statements with no real reliable evidence.

I agree. I've always thought it was a honeypot as well, so I never dug to deep into it. Given the rumors that the site's information was compromised, I'll never attempt to use it either.

I think there are enough problems that need to be fleshed out before Biden can be accepted as legitimate.

What is your thoughts on the Georgia video of pulling out ballots after the election monitors are told to go home?

Honestly, there is so much to explain that it's not easy to even know where the best place is to begin. But if you want to look into it, you can check out some of the links on hereistheevidence.com and decide for yourself. Whether you think there was enough fraud to change the result or not, I think anyone who spends some time researching it would conclude that it's important to improve the security of our elections.

They can get a court order to collect user data for servers in the US, and for Parler I'm sure that has already happened. Though I wouldn't be surprised if Parler is a honeypot anyways. It's suspicious that they ask their users for personal information.

ok explain the voter fraud please siting sources would be helpful

Voter fraud... Presidency was stolen...

Hell yeah brother.

explain to me how he didnt win legitimately

Do you think Biden won legitimately? I don't. There was so much election fraud that is just being ignored. The media is just going to pretend like Biden is uniting people when all he's doing is pushing a radical liberal agenda.

elaborate please

$300,000/mo

I find it hard to believe they could be generating that much revenue legitimately.

I think they were a political hot potato. Hosting providers likely don't want to risk their payment processors.

I think I read that they were paying AWS upwards of $300,000/mo for services.

Definitely a much larger operation than I had previously though. A client that big should have had providers, globally, drooling over the idea of a big sale.

I suspect they went with the cheapest alternative that would get them back online. Having various services hosted across many different countries only helps with the freedom of information.

While I generally agree, I think the problem with that theory is the three letter agencies are allowed to operate with impunity outside of the U.S. They may be operating with impunity inside the U.S. already, but they are violating the law by doing so. Either way, real news about the world is about to become a whole lot more sparse than a few years ago.

I guess everyone is just going to proceed with this fraud.

Sue Apple about Twitter! https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/27/twitter-walkout-wileys-anti-semitic-tweets.html

Apple users only really have themselves to blame.

Lmao, I still have a bunch of tiktoks saved where the guy is filling out like 7 ballots for Biden. I wonder if he ever got caught.

The goyim angered the rulers.

Now it's time for payback.

The people who were rioting or doing other seriously illegal things without hiding their identity weren't being too smart.

But I understand the people who just walked in without covering their face. For those people, it was a simple act of civil disobedience. Generally people do show their face while engaging in acts of civil disobedience and accept the possibility of being arrested. No one says "LOL Rosa Parks, what an idiot. She should have worn a hat and wrapped a scarf around her face before she sat on the bus. Then she should have gotten off at a stop before they could arrest her. But the idiot got caught LOL".

If actual violence happens every now and then, that gives proof that the implicit threat is actually real. I think before this happened, politicians believed that conservatives were too committed to law and order to pose any real threat. Maybe now, instead of just cowing to the left's demands out of fear, decisions will be more balanced and they will weigh the potential reaction of both sides.

The left has had the advantage when demanding things for a while because people know the left can turn violent on a dime. Some of us on the right noticed that after the riots this year, corporations and politicians were suddenly trying very hard to prove how much they support BLM and the demand to defund the police was met in multiple cities. So it's no wonder that some Trump supporters decided that they ought to try rioting as well. Apparently it is effective.

Get yourself a full body neon green body suit. That'll take care of your identifying features.

Basically: Leave your phone at home or faraday bag that shit, don't talk to press, don't post selfies on social media, don't be uniquely identifiable (visible tattoos, etc).

Same way all the idiots in Seattle/Portland/etc got arrested when throwing molotovs at police, looting stores, setting shit on fire and being dumb. Many are just one virtue signaling Instagram post away from incrimination.

If you're going to do illegal stuff, probably best to not let yourself be easily tracked regardless of political belief. Weird concept.