Recent comments

Wahaha wrote

The simpler sales pitch is that vim can do everything you can and cannot imagine. Just do a search for what you want to accomplish and find out how it is done.

First time users should just go through vimtutor, which will start vim with a document that shows you all the basic functionality and let's you do all these things, so you can build muscle memory.

As for the things vim can do that you cannot even imagine: you can type stuff in vim, let's say text_A, then undo this and write something else, let's say text_B. If you now decide text_A is really where it's at, in normal editors you're fucked, but vim can actually get it back: with this plugin

2

Rambler OP wrote

Sheesh, please bin the Nazis and racists into their own category, instead of "Adult/NSFW." Nazis are real boner-killers.

Ha, yeah... I wasn't quite for sure where to put them. But I figured labeling them NSFW was appropriate other than adding them under personal sites or services.

2

not_bob wrote

Reply to comment by Rambler in A IRC chat room on Tor by piamie

Would it be possible to require a time delay for upvotes and posts for new accounts? Even an hour or two would be enough to make it a pain to do this sort of thing.

2

Rambler OP wrote

I never was a big fan of Gnome to begin with. Something about the classic taskbar and menu will always hold a place in my heart. It's why all my Linux devices use either XFCE or MATE desktop environments.

2

Rambler wrote (edited )

Reply to Make A Wish by MrBlack

Oh, that reminds me of one I have somewhere... Let me find it.

Edit: Here

2

chiefkeef wrote

though I'm not sure what all they'd share

If you haven't actually done anything to merit them investigating you (e.g. federal crimes, applying for a job with them requiring a background check) then not much. They certainly have access to a lot of data about you, but if they haven't slapped it in a report and filed it somewhere then it's not getting released under the FOIA. I only really bothered filing one for myself in the first place because I knew for sure there'd be something there.

1

Rambler wrote (edited )

Just so members know, someone has created dozens of accounts just to upvote this one submission.

Not saying it was /u/piamie but obviously I'd be suspicious and weary of any link that gets upvoted in such a dishonest and manipulative way.

Src: New user log with a bunch of new users using the format: [same-name][random-letters] all with 1 submission vote. Not hard to figure out what they're voting for when this is the highest voted submission on the site and when the amount of created accounts is within a few numbers of a 'normal' submission upvote. (Most things get 2 or 3 upvotes, so if there are 29 new accounts all with the same name, all that have only upvoted 1 submission... It's safe to say it's likely this one. I can't see what people vote for but I can see how many votes people have given out, but nothing specific.)

5