Recent comments
awdrifter wrote
Reply to What is love? by meathandler
Love is a poison.
Wingless wrote
Looks like a plain old copyvio: https://www.concrete-online.co.uk/chinese-censorship-tank-man-sold-to-chinese-firm/ After all, once you believe the right of people to see and share images is "property", how can you object to China?
Wingless wrote
Reply to by Hitler_Was_Right
This site seems to have brought in some of the last few people left who believe in a right to "free speech", and that's a good thing.
The right not to be as dumb as a sack of hammers is a good thing also, and it's a shame the neo-Nazis didn't use it.
patatriarchist wrote
Reply to by Hitler_Was_Right
So just curious... Is this a neonazi forum?
I heard there's a connection to Raddle, but...
patatriarchist wrote
Reply to comment by podnas in What is love? by meathandler
Love is dooom, CONFIRMED.
Rambler OP wrote
Seems like the OG Freenode staff are working on https://libera.chat/ now.
burnerben wrote
Reply to Random Video by Wahaha
cool website
Rambler wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Still can't add moderators by Nyankawaii
You're added.
vistingghost wrote
Reply to What is love? by meathandler
Posting a comment and/or making an upvote by heartfelt hand. :D
Wahaha OP wrote
Reply to Overtaking Manoeuvre by Wahaha
Mirror: https://z0r.de/7848
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by podnas in What is love? by meathandler
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Still can't add moderators by Nyankawaii
I don't mind. Not that there's a lot of demand to moderate anything anyway..
podnas wrote
Reply to What is love? by meathandler
.."baby don't hurt me .. don't hurt me... no more"
Rambler wrote
Reply to Still can't add moderators by Nyankawaii
If you're cool with it and /u/wahaha is cool with it, I can make it be.
The inability to add moderators to forums you make isn't a setting on my end. It's just something to do with Postmill (the software that powers this site). I can still manually add users as mods to any forum, but for some reason forum creators can't. Hopefully it's an issue corrected in a future update of the software.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to What is love? by meathandler
A word for an emotion.
meathandler wrote
Reply to comment by rianav_a in What service would you like to see on I2P network? by XANA
Hm, I guess?
I2P rotates your identities all the time so I wouldn't worry that much about it.
liminal wrote
Reply to comment by BlackWinnerYoshi in 'Privacy Protecting' Car Location Data Seemingly Shows Where People Live, Work, and Go by Rambler
The fact that I prefer to use monero to move my funds doesn't imply that I wouldn't support laws mandating a more privacy-respecting way of making bank transfers. Even if I don't support companies marketing virtual assistants, I'm not immune to surveillance through Amazon devices.
Free market doesn't exist, the money always flow from the government, they get to decide who gets the bigger slice of the pie, and then cut a little space where people who don't know better can gamble their life away. Next time you are gonna tell me communism has nothing to do with the Soviet Union and maoist China, because that's not how it was supposed to work? These are ghosts from the past wich for some reason still haunt many people.
The state is evil, the market is evil, we must contain them both. When people will start to value real privacy, it will be too late. Right now Apple is plastering cities with commercials advertising the privacy granted by their phones, this is their main slogan: "privacy, that's iphone". After all these years, we are at this point, companies are selling the illusion of privacy, that's the kind of progress the market has brought us.
Who cares if people will start looking for real privacy, if when they'll do big companies will have already ammassed decades of data of any kind, do you think that won't be enough to control and debase billion of lives? It's not like they don't have enough already, they just need to get better at extracting value from it.
I said what would be the least we should expect, if you prefer to accept this state of affairs, until the masses won't start suddenly caring, I guess you are settling for even less than me.
burnerben wrote
Reply to Still can't add moderators by Nyankawaii
message rambler directly. ive talked to him about this before. simply ask him to do it and he will.
Nyankawaii wrote
Reply to Shounen Heroes by Wahaha
Damn Ash 0.0
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by liminal in 'Privacy Protecting' Car Location Data Seemingly Shows Where People Live, Work, and Go by Rambler
The only anonymous data is no data, but the government isn't going to help with that, so the only thing we can do is support companies that make the best products, like how the free market is supposed to work.
liminal wrote
Reply to comment by Wingless in 'Privacy Protecting' Car Location Data Seemingly Shows Where People Live, Work, and Go by Rambler
the guy who tapes you in the shower
So the carmakers? According to the article you agree to this kind of surveillance whenever you buy a modern cars, that's fucked up.
On another note, I think the least lawmakers should do is come up with a very strict definition of what constitutes "anonymized data", since that's another expressions that gets used to justify this kind of stuff.
liminal wrote (edited )
Reply to FBI secretly ran phone encryption program used by organized crime, global sting yields 800 arrests by Rambler
justice . gov/usao-sdca/press-release/file/1402426/download
here is the search warrant
Wingless wrote
Reply to 'Privacy Protecting' Car Location Data Seemingly Shows Where People Live, Work, and Go by Rambler
This is even worse than I expected. And the "solutions" are the classic BULLSHIT they feed us - "privacy" by means of not giving the data to people who don't pay money for it! ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
In order for a car to be driveable:
(a) It must have NO GODDAMNED TRANSPONDERS OF ANY KIND. (b) It must have NO SATELLITE LOCATION TRACKING CAPABILITIES. (c) It must have NO BUGS LISTENING TO YOUR CONVERSATIONS. And so on!
I added (c) because hell, there has to be an "anonymized" set of voice recordings for downloading from the same crooked auto manufacturers that set up this spy data sale!
Any company involved in PROVIDING the data resold by Otonomo needs to be named, shamed, boycotted, and obliterated. Maybe I can scrounge up an old Yugo instead, made in a free country. Otonomo isn't the problem, they're practically Chelsea Manning here. The problem is the guy who tapes you in the shower, not the one who shows you what he found on the online forum.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to Wireless earbuds are stupid. Change my mind. by Rambler
Since Bluetooth speed is 721 kbit/s, I don't think you're getting better perceived quality, considering MP3 is transparent between 175 and 245 kbit/s, even less with other codecs.
Wingless wrote
Reply to Privacy watchers see fears coming true with Google's FLoC by Rambler
"Here, I'm going to give you this ID card to present everywhere you go in order to protect your privacy" -- and people believe them -- there really are no limits to stupidity!