Recent comments

Rambler wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by sitefights in Raddle v3 onion by sitefights

Why are they hard on RAMBLE?

Something to do with me having insensitive humor and me possessing the radical belief in free speech, even speech promoting ideas that I disagree with.

We have a lot more in common than we have in our differences, the main difference is that I don't believe speech needs strict regulation and I don't jump to conclusions about someone's deeply rooted political and personal beliefs based on insignificant online interactions.

With that said, they've got a decent site. Like said over there: they do their thing and we do ours. Nothing to bicker over. A lot of the members here would get banned there, and a lot of the members there would scoff at some of the content here and not return after experiencing an unsavory exchange.

No big deal.

4

sitefights OP wrote

Reply to comment by Rambler in Raddle v3 onion by sitefights

If I find a user of what I made, I'll be glad and kind to the user. Why are they hard on RAMBLE? Btw I'm having fun with fights between them and RAMBLE a bit. Just a bit.

3

Rambler wrote (edited )

They'll delete that post and ban you as soon as Zig or Emma comes online since it mentions this site, by the way.

Good to see them upgrade to V3, though.

The software that powers this site was made for that site, by the way. In case you didn't know.

1

Wingless wrote

Reply to by scarfacedarkk

I have no idea, but my guess is that somebody is looking for an excuse to get a search warrant on ProtonMail. Odds he has a "client" in the same room with him to send the email? Do you suppose that's really his ProtonMail account? Do you suppose the mods should message ProtonMail and tell them they have jack booted thugs on the way? I mean, I'd almost send an email myself to this address to warn whoever it is that he's being gaslighted as a hit man for some reason, but I don't want the Government of China or whoever knows what the original address was for to start cracking my case.

1

Wingless wrote

People have this old fashioned myth that an image is an array of pixels on your screen. When it has been turned into a spy device that has five different kinds of hidden codes we know about, plus secret watermarks and crap we don't, from who knows how many pieces of hardware and software. Not to mention way more resolution, apparently, than is needed to read the label on a package of cheese.

For all that, we get pictures that you can't paste from one web browser window to another without them turning black and losing features. Because, like "phones", the thing they are supposed to do is such a low priority, behind so many spies in line, that they are gradually losing the ability to do it at all.

3