Recent comments
Kalchaya wrote
Reply to How to attract more crowd? by santorihelix
One way is to get Ramble better represented on the alternative search engines. Yesterday I did an experiment on Google, Duckduckgo, and Startpage. Tried two searches:
ramble
ramble.pw
The second was a sort of 'control', since obviously if someone already knows the full name, he would not need a search engine. On search one, Google came up with every possible answer but the right one. One search two, Google provided the correct link. On search one and search two, Duckduckgo failed to provide the ramble.pw link. On search one, Startpage provided every link but the right one...some were ramble.com, ramble.org, ramblechat, and rambleofficial. On search two, Startpage did list the ramble.pw link.
All three failed the test. Unfortunately I have no idea how to solve this...I can only point out the problem.
podnas wrote
Clearnet site
____ wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Brave Browser leaks your Tor / Onion service requests through DNS. by Rambler
Don't even bother. Post it on Reddit alternatives like Ruqqus, Poal, Phuks, Notabug, etc. instead. Don't support sites that have heavy censorship.
Rambler OP wrote
/r/privacy on reddit won't allow this post because:
While we (vastly) prefer the Tor Browser over the Brave one, you'll need a better source than the one you found. Can you find something from a more widely recognized NetSec expert? Something along the lines of Bruce Schneier's blog or something at that level of credibility?
Does anyone else wish to replicate this to confirm?
____ wrote
Reply to I2P+ 0.9.49+ released! by Rambler
I prefer i2pd because it doesn't use Java bloat.
____ wrote
Definitely always just use Tor Browser on desktop, if only to prevent sites from fingerprinting you.
div1337 wrote
It's disappointing, I'm wondering if it has something to do with how Chromium works? Perhaps using Chromium as a base was a mistake.
Rambler wrote
Reply to Request old.reddit layout option by beni_hull
I agree, a more polished look would definitely help. I can't browse reddit's new site, not sure how people navigate that mess. Old reddit is where it's at.
I need to put more into the dev site before pushing in major updates to this instance. There are a lot of little features that people want that would make the site better it's just a matter of figuring it out myself or trying to find trustworthy people who are more capable and able to assist.
A more "old reddit" look with RES features like post / image preview from the index of forums (though, JS required) would be a huge upgrade.
CptL4 wrote
i was using torch search engine
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by boobs in Signal Needs to do Better For its Response to the Anti-Censorship Community - It's FOSS News by Rambler
there is no "anti censorship community" but there is a pro-censorship lobby.
This, x1,000.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to I2P+ 0.9.49+ released! by Rambler
I2P+ > I2P
boobs wrote
Reply to Signal Needs to do Better For its Response to the Anti-Censorship Community - It's FOSS News by Rambler
anti censorship is the default position.
there is no "anti censorship community" but there is a pro-censorship lobby.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
Reply to comment by mr4channer in What features do you look for in a VPN? by Rambler
Actually, e-mail verification is fine for me, as long as it will let me use aliases, like those Riseup has. But yes, I do hate CRAPTCHAs, especially the Goolag one. Sure, I can use Buster (https://github.com/dessant/buster, clear net only), but it doesn't really help when you're continuously using a service that requires it because you're still supporting the cancer.
BlackWinnerYoshi wrote
I use the onion site because it's the network I'm the most familiar with (besides the clear net, of course - but I prefer Tor over it because Tor has at least some privacy baked in)
Stegacite wrote
Reply to Still feeling cute. by RealDonaldTrump
"Sorry, the Peacock Throne was unavailable. You'll have to use the Duck."
notaspook wrote
I2P to lurk.
Wahaha wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by awdrifter in Is there a browser that can ignore SSL error? by awdrifter
Well, according to the Internet: https://windowsreport.com/fix-ssl_error_rx_record_too_long-firefox-error/
I don't get this error, so.. who knows. Must be something on your end.
MilkyPastel wrote
Clearnet, for now.
BasedPatriot wrote
Usually the Tor onion site since it redirects automatically to it in the Tor browser.
awdrifter OP wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Is there a browser that can ignore SSL error? by awdrifter
Just tried Firefox, I'm still getting the error.
Error code: SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG
SmokeyMeadow wrote
Reply to Joe Biden is racist. Change my mind. by BasedPatriot
He'll still get the black vote by a wide margin, so it's hard to give a shit. Biden could put on blackface and reenact Song of the South on the White House front lawn and still lock that demographic. Nothing will make them not vote Democrat.
BasedPatriot OP wrote
Reply to Joe Biden is racist. Change my mind. by BasedPatriot
They don't know how to get online to get in line. https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1361863935603916804/pu/vid/1280x720/qdlbzdyHFxsJT_s7.mp4?tag=10
mr4channer wrote
using (((yandex)))
mr4channer wrote
Reply to comment by BlackWinnerYoshi in What features do you look for in a VPN? by Rambler
email verify is out too, just let users register with username and password, and they have to complete non js 8 or more character image captcha. how hard is it to store usernames and passwords in db, prune old/unused accounts that haven't logged in for a while. no log vpn.
____ wrote
Reply to How are you connecting to this site? Clearnet? Tor? I2P? Yggdrasil? Loki? by Rambler
Clearnet.