Recent comments in /f/Privacy
1122332211 wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted152 in Has anyone else with Signal desktop app noticed this? by Rambler
i think probably both. no one likes these apps that harvest data, but for most there is no other alternative. Musk gave a push at just the right time.
Seidoken wrote
The open push to violate the 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendments should make everyone extremely angry. But even my normie tier conservative coworkers are going along with it.
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
Reply to comment by StreetMix in No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
In all fairness, faggotry is a good thing.
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
Thank you for sharing.
J0yI9YUX41Wx wrote
Reply to comment by PwndToaster in No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
"It's no secret that Mozilla is a progressive company"
I'm done. F those guys.
Wingless OP wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in Does "Happy Eyeballs" mean that every internet connection is logged with the hardware MAC address, even for "normal sites" on IPv4? by Wingless
I thought that to send anything in IPv6 they are taking down MAC addresses.
mr4channer wrote
Reply to comment by KeeJef in Millions Flock to Telegram and Signal as Fears Grow Over Big Tech by Rambler
every should switch to xmpp/jabber but signal and telegram are normie friendly.
mr4channer wrote
based
KeeJef wrote (edited )
You might want to consider Session too if you are worried about big tech, Signal and Telegram servers are hosted on AWS and Azure respectively.Session doesnt have centralized servers https://getsession.org/
EgregiousPomegranate wrote
Good.
PwndToaster wrote
Reply to No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
"In 2008, he had donated $1,000 to support passing California Proposition 8" Based
ex0dus wrote
Reply to The Truth About Protonmail - Privacy Watchdog by Rambler
ProtonMail also doxed Tom Spark during some controversy ( https://medium.com/@gaetanosabin/did-nordvpn-and-protonmail-violate-gdpr-and-us-privacy-laws-by-doxing-vpn-affiliate-2fe7b0d51d1f ) I'd just avoid anything Proton. I currently use CTemplar but obviously I still don't do anything critical over email.
mr4channer wrote
rip
EgregiousPomegranate wrote
Reply to comment by Rambler in (Mapped) GPS metadata of 68k videos uploaded to Parler. by Rambler
My gut tells me that this will result in arsons and assaults. I hope not though. Good thing I've never posted anything on Parler, I wouldn't expect those freaks to check if those were just cat pics.
ex0dus wrote
Use official Tor Browser or I2P + some ungoogled chromium based browser and configure the proxy manually
Rambler wrote
Reply to Does "Happy Eyeballs" mean that every internet connection is logged with the hardware MAC address, even for "normal sites" on IPv4? by Wingless
Apparently a whole slew of browsers are sending IPv6 connections whenever they connect, "just to see which one is faster", which sure sounds like a lot of bandwidth for somebody to pay for ... must be worth it to someone.
Don't they just send a packet to measure response time? I'm not certain that'd amount to any noticeable increase in monthly BW usage.
Can someone who actually understands the Dismalest Science enlighten us?
I'm not your guy. It's an interesting topic of discussion and I hope someone who knows what they're talking about can come in and enlighten us.
furry wrote
Like everyone else has already said, it's not a good idea using Apple or Android. If you really want to browse darknet on your phone, look into GrapheneOS or a Linux phone and use tor on those.
Rambler OP wrote
Source: https://twitter.com/kcimc/status/1348815246039805953
Expect more detailed, street level maps of "evil Trump supporters" to be made indexable and available to all. I'd assume that if you uploaded images or videos without first stripping the meta data out yourself, or if you had a verified account and uploaded your ID and details, that you're already on some 'evil conservative' list that's being compiled and refined.
RoboGoat2000 wrote
Reply to Police have right to a suspect's internet info without a warrant, Arizona Supreme Court rules by Rambler
WTF, the same website posted another article concluding the exact opposite of OP's article: https://tucson.com/news/local/court-arizonans-have-right-to-internet-privacy-from-authorities-without-warrant/article_6a9375fe-3c88-5bee-ac2b-e0d5a8ce2ceb.html#tracking-source=article-related-bottom
My take away: Your personal info like name and address are protected, but what you do online is not.
mr4channer wrote
fuck muslims
StreetMix wrote
Reply to No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
LMAO the article is retarded. Saying that faggotry is a good thing and FF is more secure.....I guess I do should use Brave after all.
boobs wrote
Reply to No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
I don't use brave because it's "good" I use it because firefox is shit and brave is just the next least shit browser.
hideyourlies wrote
As with everyone else, would not reccomend at all.
mr4channer wrote
dont use a phone
StreetMix wrote
Reply to comment by J0yI9YUX41Wx in No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
How so?