Google wrote on December 13, 2020 at 10:44 AM

I use NoScript, thank you. I can browse github without js most of the time.

idk wrote on December 17, 2020 at 5:26 PM

I am familiar with this complaint, but it came a little too late for me to change the hosting service decision from Gitlab to Gitea. That being said, since I generally consider gitea a little more managable for smaller, self-hosted deployments, and since it's pure-Go and a little more monolithic, it will be slightly easier to set it up to be self configuring with SAMv3. So give it a little time, and I'll make Gitea I2P-Native.

abralelie OP wrote on December 13, 2020 at 6:05 PM

What's this gotta do with Javascript?

Google wrote on December 14, 2020 at 1:28 AM

It a) uses more resources, b) help fingerprinting, c) may disqualify your browser/os easier and faster because of bleeding-edge browser APIs that you mostly don't need.

abralelie OP wrote on December 16, 2020 at 7:23 PM

Valid concerns, but maybe you misread. This is about GitLab, not Github.

Google wrote on December 16, 2020 at 10:53 PM

I'm talking about all git services that uses javascript. GitHub, Gogs and Gitea cooperate better with NoScript. Bitbucket and GitLab are meh.