Recent comments in /f/AskRamble
not_bob wrote
Reply to Thoughts on The Congressional Committee on Oversight and Accountability UFO hearings that just took place? by Rambler
Not to sound like a nutjob, but there are a lot of things they have kept hidden. More transparency is needed.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by not_bob in What are some interesting podcasts that you like? by Rambler
Yeah, he's great. I used to listen when working 3rd shift in a machine shop.
not_bob wrote
That's the one that has gotten me though many a late night drive. Others too no doubt, but that's my default.
I'm still only a fraction of the way through his work though.
Qball wrote
Reply to Which filesystem do you prefer to use? by Wahaha
You have the correct idea. Previously I used XFS. Shure for torrent storage I use loop with btrfs. For USB fat32... for old hardware and OS'es. I forgot what Hammer (Dragon Fly bsd) is used for or if I ever use it (I gave up on DragonFly because of ransom crap attention). Just make sure you have hardware disk encryption (all motherboard manufacturers have it but don't give it with default BIOS) to prevent watermarking.
not_bob wrote
Reply to Which filesystem do you prefer to use? by Wahaha
I tend to use ext4, but it depends on the use case.
awdrifter wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by z3d in change site default theme by podnas
It's still happening on Waterfox. [img]https://pic8.co/sh/ksO7Th.png[/img]
Edit: Seems like they fixed it. But now the text is white when editing.
z3d wrote (edited )
Reply to change site default theme by podnas
The issue should be fixed now, regardless of whether your browser sends a preference for the light or dark theme. Previously, if your browser requested the light theme, some of the font colors were off. Apologies for the inconvenience.
HMTg927 wrote
Reply to change site default theme by podnas
I am seeing the same thing with the Seamonkey browser.
awdrifter wrote (edited )
Reply to change site default theme by podnas
Yep, same issue. But u/Rambler hasn't posted since Nov 18, 2022. I think this site is pretty much abandoned.
podnas wrote
Reply to Which filesystem do you prefer to use? by Wahaha
memfs
HMTg927 OP wrote
Reply to comment by BlueHat in I Think this is the Best Looking Forum I have Seen on the Internet by HMTg927
Thank you. Incognet does not seem to have a website. Strange.
BlueHat wrote
Not the admin, but I'll answer some of your questions.
The software behind Ramble is postmill (see this comment).
Regarding hosting, if you look at the bottom of the pages on Ramble, you may see:
Hosting by Incognet
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Just talk to the people who spend years going to Africa to build infrastructure and schools to teach them and see what they have to say about this. They are mostly incapable of being schooled and they tend to destroy the stuff you build for them.
If a country is a shithole, it's because of the people living in that country. Africa is pretty much the jackpot as far as continents go. No harsh winters and there's plenty of everything. When white Europeans used to live there it was ancient Egypt and a prosperous civilization. The places with white Europeans are still prosperous civilizations.
There is no magic earth. It's all the people. Hundreds of years a go a German dude (Johann August Sutter) went to California and made a prosperous settlement inside of a desert by redirecting mountain water.
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
That isn't science as such. That's an opinion that might explain why there are countries that don't seemingly do as well.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Dude, it's genetics. There is no such thing as magic earth. Shit people create shithole countries. Simple as that.
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Racial? Cultural? Environmental? All factors to that outcome.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
It's just that even the richest black people commit more violent crime than the poorest of white folks.
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Murders of a particular race can be correlated with many factors--perhaps say poverty or drug usage or even extreme wealth or lately "being a rich Russian billionaire." Why those factors exist might be spiritual, economic, self-caused, other-caused, or a whole slew of sociao-political reasons. The bottom line is, if you want to see it as race alone, that's how you are going to see it, but that isn't really science talking. More likely, it is some "liberal academic conditoning" talking, which often masquerades as science.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
You have to be blind to not see the correlation with the race:
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
What I defined are the pieces that constitute an actual scientific study. What you are trying to make a case for is correlation between murder victims and color. You are confusing "fact" with "Correlation" which is a huge scientific no no. You posted facts. The "pattern" to the numbers could come from any number of factors which may or may not be race related.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Yeah, it's called pattern recognition.
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by Wahaha in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Nah. Those facts are a reflection of statistical measures of people who get murdered without any operational definitions defining what "murder" is. Skin color, on the other hand, is a measurable difference that people readily detect and foolishly base conclusions upon.
Wahaha wrote
Reply to comment by spektor in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Racism isn't a hate of a skin color. That's the usual deflection. Racism is a reflection of facts like this: https://files.catbox.moe/i96yv9.png
spektor wrote
Reply to comment by smallpond in Update to site wide rules by smallpond
Hang on. I'll get my wallet.
NapkinBlizzard wrote (edited )
Reply to Thoughts on The Congressional Committee on Oversight and Accountability UFO hearings that just took place? by Rambler
I think this is huge news, but I'm surprised that not many people seem to care or just brush it off because there's no smoking gun (authentic videos, photos, etc.). The best we have are the Navy videos that the Pentagon released a while back.
If you want to dive into the rabbit hole, here are some stories from people who have supposedly worked on these retrieval programs:
I wouldn't be surprised if people like this now start to come forward to Congress. Ross Coulthart seems to know of others that want to talk.
Some of the implications of this shit is scary as hell and I don't think our governments will use any of this technology to "help people" or "advance the human race". They just use it to build better bombs and craft to kill "the other guy" (China, Russia, etc.).