Recent comments
GeorgeConstanza wrote
Reply to Name that country. (Details in post's body) by Rambler
Me and my German friends will like to offer you a toast: Prost! The point was that you were tracked. There is an iconic casino close by. Abstein from posting faces with locations. License plates another no-no.
There are 2 networks that encourage you to sell yourself with your friends and familly, no point in using i2p if you are "prost". Search for the kosher slaver and rice eating yellow belly roach.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by bucharest in Name that country. (Details in post's body) by Rambler
Bucharest... Try Constanța :)
spacevini8 wrote
Reply to Average KaliLinux user. by Rambler
100% acurate lmfao
bucharest wrote
Reply to Name that country. (Details in post's body) by Rambler
I can name that location the people etc... Don't make me trace you!
righttoprivacy wrote
Yikes (checks version of xz tuils). Glad that one did not reach us.
thesea OP wrote
Reply to comment by z3d in Question about identities in I2P by thesea
Thanks. I was wondering if I could use my i2p email as a burner address on clearnet or if the email is somehow connected to other i2p identities like torrenting. Like they all using the same public router address or something. Now I know that's not the case
z3d wrote
Reply to Question about identities in I2P by thesea
Your i2pmail address isn't directly linkable to your torrents unless you happen to post torrents to trackers with your i2pmail e-mail address embedded in the tracker information. If your i2pmail address uses the same name as your postman account, then people may be able to guess your e-mail address from your postman account name.
Generally, as long as you keep your I2P identity separate from your clearnet identities, you should be fine. If you don't want to be identifiable as the same person on various services, use a separate identity for each service that requires a login.
Regarding seeding torrents, if you're the only person seeding a torrent, then a restart of your router will give you a new I2PSnark destination but may still reveal to the observant that your old destination and new destination correlate. On the other hand, if you're one of many seeds, it's difficult to correlate your previous I2PSnark destination with your new destination.
For extra peace of mind, you can configure I2PSnark to delay starting torrents for a longer period post-startup to make correlation even more difficult.
datajuggler5544 wrote (edited )
Reply to FreshRSS i2p and tor support 🎉🎉 by PrivacyOsint
Perfect timing, just setup a FreshRSS deployment yesterday! Will it work even when dockerized? That is, can I still just point the proxy to 127.0.0.1:4444?
Immortals wrote
Reply to *eagle noises* by Rambler
Try understand and pay taxes in Europe :)
Immortals wrote
Interesting and a bit dangerous.
righttoprivacy wrote
It's certainly going to get interesting
not_bob wrote
Reply to What Should Russians Do If VPNs Are Banned? by z3d
I wish place would not do this bullshit.
Access to a free and open internet is a basic human right at this point.
z3d wrote
teddit.i2p should now be back online. Apologies for the inconvenience.
lolz wrote
Reply to comment by not_bob in Hit count implementation on static eepsite by bottticelli
Ok where to put this
lolz wrote
Reply to comment by righttoprivacy in These Are the Notorious NSA Furby Documents Showing Spy Agency Freaking Out About Embedded AI in Children's Toy by PrivacyOsint
Uh huh
lolz wrote
Reply to Mother of All Breaches Data Leak Pulls Together 26 Billion Records From Thousands of Prior Breaches by PrivacyOsint
You can search it on search.0t.rocks
gmail wrote
I used to file complains... now I get even.
gmail wrote
Reply to comment by PrivacyOsint in Google Update Reveals AI Will Read All Your Private Messages by righttoprivacy
You do have a choice. Google does not read your email. Don't bring AI in.
righttoprivacy wrote (edited )
This is sad. The walls over the garden grow ever taller. :'( I don't for a second believe he bought it for "free speech", as deamplification is admitted, and blocking nitter destroys neutral 3rd party searches.
And there are hidden owners. Believe some doc mentioned around 80? It was ten's of controlling interest owners, that much I remember.
whyO OP wrote
Reply to comment by stormycloud in by whyO
No questions really besides why it was deleted, It's a cool page!
stormycloud wrote (edited )
Reply to by whyO
Yes what question do you have about the graphs?
righttoprivacy wrote (edited )
Reply to ChatGPT no longer requires an account — but there's a catch by z3d
Rewards come to those who 🙇 bow down (submit their ID / data) to the all knowing AI 🤖 🧎