Recent comments

GeorgeConstanza wrote

Me and my German friends will like to offer you a toast: Prost! The point was that you were tracked. There is an iconic casino close by. Abstein from posting faces with locations. License plates another no-no.

There are 2 networks that encourage you to sell yourself with your friends and familly, no point in using i2p if you are "prost". Search for the kosher slaver and rice eating yellow belly roach.

1

thesea OP wrote

Reply to comment by z3d in Question about identities in I2P by thesea

Thanks. I was wondering if I could use my i2p email as a burner address on clearnet or if the email is somehow connected to other i2p identities like torrenting. Like they all using the same public router address or something. Now I know that's not the case

1

z3d wrote

Your i2pmail address isn't directly linkable to your torrents unless you happen to post torrents to trackers with your i2pmail e-mail address embedded in the tracker information. If your i2pmail address uses the same name as your postman account, then people may be able to guess your e-mail address from your postman account name.

Generally, as long as you keep your I2P identity separate from your clearnet identities, you should be fine. If you don't want to be identifiable as the same person on various services, use a separate identity for each service that requires a login.

Regarding seeding torrents, if you're the only person seeding a torrent, then a restart of your router will give you a new I2PSnark destination but may still reveal to the observant that your old destination and new destination correlate. On the other hand, if you're one of many seeds, it's difficult to correlate your previous I2PSnark destination with your new destination.

For extra peace of mind, you can configure I2PSnark to delay starting torrents for a longer period post-startup to make correlation even more difficult.

3

lolz OP wrote

Reply to by lolz

my password is lolz123456

1

righttoprivacy wrote (edited )

This is sad. The walls over the garden grow ever taller. :'( I don't for a second believe he bought it for "free speech", as deamplification is admitted, and blocking nitter destroys neutral 3rd party searches.

And there are hidden owners. Believe some doc mentioned around 80? It was ten's of controlling interest owners, that much I remember.

2

z3d wrote

Reply to by whyO

Just posting a link to a site without any accompanying text is, more often than not, likely to get your post deleted. Please provide some context to your posts in future. (This thread will self-delete in 24 hours)

2

whyO OP wrote

Reply to comment by stormycloud in by whyO

No questions really besides why it was deleted, It's a cool page!

1

stormycloud wrote (edited )

Reply to by whyO

Yes what question do you have about the graphs?

1