Recent comments
righttoprivacy wrote
Reply to Just do it! by StableDiffuser
"Just do it"... always imagined this slogan comes about because if you think too much about something, you'll probably change your mind!
noptic wrote
I see more services making I2P mirrors available so people can use the services privately. This will result in some people running I2P only services, then eventually a large portion of the internet will be usable on I2P.
I am making this comment while on I2P, if more services had I2P mirrors I would use them instead of clear net.
righttoprivacy OP wrote
Reply to comment by not_bob in If UK forces Back-door Access To Encryption Apple w/Pull iMessages / Facetime by righttoprivacy
They may not be perfect "iPhone: that's privacy" phone... but with their massive public influence, happy for every call-out they make. ;)
not_bob wrote
Reply to If UK forces Back-door Access To Encryption Apple w/Pull iMessages / Facetime by righttoprivacy
Good on Apple! More companies need to call bullshit like this out.
not_bob wrote
My expectation is rather bleak. People already willing give up so much personal data without a second thought.
You and RTP have put this into words far better than I could. Thank you.
righttoprivacy wrote (edited )
Without collective action by people, I see current trajectory, continuing.
One of continual x, y emergencies (par for the course) used to strip our rights / freedom online / offline.
For example, Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum states: "we need to make a vaccine for the internet". That is something that stuck with me. I have to wonder, what is an "internet vaccine"? Can only imagine the wish is to "clean" (control) the internet, information, and visibility (amplify / deamplification) using AI, digitalID, worldwide. DigitalID will be introduced as a way to increase reputation / visibility. It's not a pretty picture.
We can clearly see innovation is no longer by chance, but instead being financed. Every trend has been by design.
Corporations continuing to make invasive increments in entertainment, "fun" (ie: media, ring doorbell cam TV show, etc - "building / funding our own mass surveillance for plutocracies is fun!").
I see people going 1 of 2 directions: on one hand, we have people who continue to integrate their reality into the newest invasive dopamine hit releasing tech / social products. That group will eventually have all behavior, speech, and lives fully automated by AI (as integration becomes ever more tailored to / in the individual). They will eventually lose what it means to be human (side effect of this tech + loss of privacy / behavior autonomy on long enough time period IMO). All speech / behavior will be policed in a privatized way much like we are seeing today. An increase in the same.
I see another group who for one reason or another choose to enhance private spaces (remaining human). Whether out of curiosity, instinct, or from learning the hard way by having their lives ruined in one way or another by dark corporate profit interests. And it will involve tech on the path of I2P, where all users pitch in resources to pool stronger anonymity be it network, radio or processing.
I forsee many companies willing to engage more of the darkside of AI to find new profit avenues (behind the scenes, and if powerful enough, out in open), to gain power / influence. From deeper / more malicious "reputation" based businesses of various kinds, to products designed to actively manipulate the former humans in the above group using their data. Possibly even businesses catering to manipulate individuals, for other individuals. A more mainstream service of sorts (in comparison to today).
AI will become the modern day "ministry of truth" (1984).
Most don't change until they feel pain. 🧐
Also why it's important to both embrace and create alternatives to the mainstream, like I2P, and alternative networks / mesh.
I do see real hope in that type of thing growing as people better understand threats in the landscape.
righttoprivacy wrote (edited )
Reply to Nah, I got this. by Rambler
😂 Love it.
not_bob OP wrote
Reply to comment by righttoprivacy in The Battle for Digital Privacy Is Reshaping the Internet (Published 2021) by not_bob
Facebook cares about it's users!
bows head
And people just hand personal data over right and left ...
righttoprivacy wrote
Another self serving pact to provide a dash of extra plausible deniability for spying, chock full of empty promises...
As is the modern day standard. 🙃
righttoprivacy wrote
Facebook: “ 😭 We support giving people more control over how their data is used, but Apple’s far-reaching changes occurred without input from the industry..."
😇
noptic wrote
Be your own doctor as much as possible.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to Hobo Stobe: Freight Train Hopping by Rambler
I have a soft-spot in my heart for these type of people. As an avid backpacker, it's not uncommon to meet folk doing similar things on foot. I've picked up hitchhikers in the past that have similar stories, traveling vast distances. I've shared my home for several days to one of the nicest dudes ever who was bike-packing across America and just wanted to rest for a few days and pitch a tent in the back yard and use a shower. Lot of nice folks out there who may not fit into ordinary roles in modern society but are the most genuine, happy, and free people you may ever meet.
righttoprivacy wrote (edited )
An N Y T onion a day keeps the paywall away ;) https://www.nytimesn7cgmftshazwhfgzm37qxb44r64ytbb2dj3x62d2lljsciiyd.onion/2023/07/10/upshot/private-equity-doctors-offices.html (bypass)
Quote: “Private equity is like the system on steroids,” said Sherry Glied, the dean of the Wagner School of Public Service at New York University. “Every time there’s an opportunity for making money, P.E. is going to move faster than everyone else. And consolidation is the way to do that.”
It's not about providing "better care" as I'm sure the spokesperson is touting. 🙄
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by not_bob in What are some interesting podcasts that you like? by Rambler
Yeah, he's great. I used to listen when working 3rd shift in a machine shop.
noptic wrote
History says French govt. are actual terrorists.
not_bob OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by righttoprivacy in Crosberry Pi, a cute cyberdeck. by not_bob
I've built a number of these over the years. Overall pretty useless.
The most useful one is the one that sits attached the visor in my van. Pull the visor down and there is a screen.
It's perfect for use in parking lots, or keeping track of things while driving. Though, it's really only suitable for text mode stuff. Too under powered.
not_bob wrote
That's the one that has gotten me though many a late night drive. Others too no doubt, but that's my default.
I'm still only a fraction of the way through his work though.
StableDiffuser OP wrote
Reply to comment by Morpheus in Dominatrix by StableDiffuser
Made with clipdrop (Stable Diffusion) - link in the sidebar!
Morpheus wrote
Reply to What goes bump in the night. by Rambler
This is wicked!!!
Morpheus wrote
Reply to Dominatrix by StableDiffuser
Nice!! Thanks for posting looks awesome!! Did you make this??
righttoprivacy wrote
Reply to Crosberry Pi, a cute cyberdeck. by not_bob
Looks fun
righttoprivacy wrote
Another small business... trying to scrape by. 😆
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by noptic in Red Hat cutting back RHEL source availability by Rambler
This.
I work in the web-hosting industry, and there are a handful of common and popular proprietary software used that used to require CentOS / RHEL as the base OS. Then most of them now support AlmaLinux, which I've got on a handful of servers as a requirement. Haven't really used Rocky Linux, but have used AlmaLinux a lot now, and I run CloudLinuxOS which is/was RHEL based but it's a commercial Linux OS geared towards this industry.
Anyway, FINALLY some of these companies are producing statements that they're releasing Debian/Ubuntu betas or have it on their roadmap for making their software work on these OSes. Which is great.
noptic wrote
Reply to Red Hat cutting back RHEL source availability by Rambler
There are so many quality alternatives now that this decision will only lower their market share. They are trying hard to be the new Microsoft.
divergenti2p wrote
Reply to First Impressions of the Yggdrasil Peer-to-Peer Network by HMTg927
so it says in there ,everyone can see your ip address so what is the point?