Recent comments
z3d wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by kitz in email exchange in I2P by kitz
Note that some mail servers or services may not play nice with i2pmail.org.
Can you tell me more about this point? Or where I can read about it?
It's really hit and miss, no golden rule. For the most part, things work fine, though if a service or remote mail server has i2pmail.org in their blacklist, then you might experience issues. Some services appear to treat i2pmail.org as they would a throwaway e-mail host.
Qball wrote
Reply to A Brief Review of ReactOS by HMTg927
It did not work last time I tried it. Maybe next one or in the next life.
Qball wrote
Reply to Which filesystem do you prefer to use? by Wahaha
You have the correct idea. Previously I used XFS. Shure for torrent storage I use loop with btrfs. For USB fat32... for old hardware and OS'es. I forgot what Hammer (Dragon Fly bsd) is used for or if I ever use it (I gave up on DragonFly because of ransom crap attention). Just make sure you have hardware disk encryption (all motherboard manufacturers have it but don't give it with default BIOS) to prevent watermarking.
Qball wrote (edited by a moderator )
Reply to Red Hat cutting back RHEL source availability by Rambler
I knew it! Digital masochists are embedded in this network. I was Fed-up for a decade and when the typewriter shills took over, I knew they will backdoor the crap out of Red Hat. Silver Blue rawhide was my last use around 2018 before I considered Red Hat used toilet paper.
not_bob wrote
Reply to email exchange in I2P by kitz
mail.i2p works very well. I've used it for years to communicate with people in and out of the network.
kitz OP wrote
Reply to comment by z3d in email exchange in I2P by kitz
Note that some mail servers or services may not play nice with i2pmail.org.
Can you tell me more about this point? Or where I can read about it?
i2pbote should be considered defunct. No active developers and a huge chunk of less than ideal legacy code.
The fact that there is a problem with the site is quite obvious.
I have seen some recent changes from the team in their forks. It looks like the project has some kind of support. Why don't they merge them into the main repository? Perhaps this activity will revive the community.
Yes, it's alive and apparently in active development.
I'll take note. I was just confused by the emptiness on the forum.
kitz OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by postman in email exchange in I2P by kitz
Do not quite understand.
Is federation with other email servers inside I2P via SMTP is possible?
Or is it just a gateway to clearnet with clearnet federation?
In any case, this does not cancel the fact - monopoly of the service without alternative.
UPD: This is not a stone in your direction, rather a regret that there are no other similar services.
z3d wrote (edited )
Reply to email exchange in I2P by kitz
mail.i2p - it seems that the project does not respond to other servers via SMTP.
Internally, @mail.i2p is used, externally, @i2pmail.org. So when supplying an e-mail address for a clearnet service, use you@i2pmail.org as the reply address. Note that some mail servers or services may not play nice with i2pmail.org.
bote.i2p looks like it hasn't been updated for long time.
i2pbote should be considered defunct. No active developers and a huge chunk of less than ideal legacy code.
Is purplebote.i2p alive?
Yes, it's alive and apparently in active development. See: https://github.com/PurpleBote/pboted and/or jump on the I2P IRC network and have a chat with polistern, the lead developer.
postman wrote (edited by a moderator )
Reply to email exchange in I2P by kitz
mail.i2p relays mail TO and FROM the internet as well. Check hq.postman.i2p for more information on this feature.
z3d wrote
Reply to What is the ideal / preferred way to get your node into the "global" address book? by MasterDestroyer
The official i2pd registrar is located here: http://reg.i2p/ and is currently the only registrar that validates hostnames to ensure the submitter owns the host they're registering.
Rambler wrote
Ha, I saw where people were using it to generate Windows keys with this method.
idk wrote
Reply to Red Hat cutting back RHEL source availability by Rambler
Sad to see it happen but it was pretty clear that they were getting worse at ATO in Raleigh, which was basically a FAANG convention. Bunch of depressed Google employees actively trying to get people to steal merch. Shit was weird.
not_bob wrote
I have used a few of these open source models. They are impressive. I'm curious to see what the world does with them.
not_bob wrote
This is unacceptable!
Rambler OP wrote
not_bob wrote
This is total bullshit. The desire for privacy is not a crime.
not_bob wrote
Reply to Red Hat cutting back RHEL source availability by Rambler
Red Hat was only ever my choice when I was young and didn't know any better. Best to avoid them entirely.
iop23up wrote
Reply to comment by not_bob in Reddit Goes Nuclear, Removes Moderators of Subreddits That Continued To Protest by z3d
That would be people who like reddit in its form of freedom of speech and people who would like to go (a little bit) further i guess .
But can they handle the ramble? Are you ready to ramble? Ramble in i2p! lol
not_bob wrote
Reply to comment by iop23up in Reddit Goes Nuclear, Removes Moderators of Subreddits That Continued To Protest by z3d
I'd like to think that we will get some of the refugees.
This whole reddit thing is a mess.
iop23up wrote
Who will get all this homeless reddits? Lemme or ramble? :)
iop23up wrote
What regulations? They will push ai in every crack of society to push development. faster for establishing their master control program. What risks? Does anybody think, that ai isn't at moment deciding what to buy/sell on the markets? High risk to crash everything. Bomb which decides by ai detection if their nearer coming target is civilian to then destroy itself before impact - low risk, they would die anyway.
Rambler wrote
Now requesting $4,500,000 and reversal of their proposed API changes.
horriblealtercation179 wrote
Reply to Widespread Attacks Push Tor to Proof-of-Work by z3d
finally, let's see if it improves speed somehow. hopefully there will be benchmarks
awdrifter wrote
Reply to comment by z3d in A new vision and direction for RAMBLE by Rambler
Ok, thanks for the explanation.
Rambler wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by z3d in email exchange in I2P by kitz
In my (limited) experience using i2pmail.org as a clearnet relay, I find that an expected email may not hit my @mail.i2p inbox until some hours later. I'm not certain if this delay is caused from the clearnet to I2P path or within the I2P network itself.Still a very suitable and beneficial service, of course. But something to consider for time sensitive emails, as using that email address for something you may need a password reset on or email based auth-code that expires after XX minutes, you may find yourself in between a rock and a hard place.EDIT: Disregard the above about it not being suitable for time-senstive emails. I just did a test, and received my clearnet email to my I2P inbox in about 5 minutes. In the past, it had taken hours, but in hindsight, the webmail inbox may have been cached or it could have just been a one-off fluke. ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯?