Recent comments

Rambler wrote (edited )

These are pretty wide spectrum weapons, right? From what I've read I'm not certain it's possible to narrow it in on an individual and they seem rather large. Not something one could hide, unless the images shown are for demonstration purposes. I'd imagine a box truck with a big dish on top facing an embassy would raise some suspicion and prompt response from some local officials...

1

Rambler wrote

The part that got me:

When he slipped through the back door of a strip mall, exited through the front door and ran down the sidewalk, it caught that, too.

How? How did they get that, too?

Are they able to narrow down SSID's of mobile devices on-the-fly to possible suspects so they can more easily follow them in a crowd, or if they go into a building and out a distant exit? It simpler facial recognition?

Each drone — including long-distance cameras, other sensors and software — costs the department about $35,000. But the overriding cost of the program lies in the many officers needed to operate the drones.

I'm curious what the "other sensors and software" is. Telephoto lenses and stabilizing gimbals on hobby, home made quadcopters / multi-rotors are nothing new. I was building these some years ago before "drone" was the accepted everyday terminology of a RC multi-rotor. Makes me wonder what they have access to...

3

Rambler wrote

The revelation this week of Huawei’s role in testing artificial-intelligence surveillance technology — including a face-scanning camera system that could send a “Uighur alarm” to police if it detected a member of the minority group.

I'm surprised there isn't as much global outrage over this (and well, a lot of the stuff China does and continues to do with little care from the global community.)

1

Rambler wrote

Nice! I just watched this a month or two back, though I had to pay for it... Didn't think to check BitChute for it.

Not a bad documentary. Definitely had a few things I hadn't heard before, namely the unexplained deactivation (or activation) of silos stood out. That bit was a bit concerning.

2

Google wrote (edited )

Tor Browser.

Now using Ungoogled-chromium, but is behind few versions.

Scared by all those security fixes? Then stop using all those chromium-based browsers.

1

7seas OP wrote

Reply to by 7seas

Fuck niger, fuck Chinks, fuck Jews, Fuck niggers, Fuck nice people, fuck trump, fuck biden, fuck kamlea, fuck clinton, fuck fuck fuck. Who cares bitch! Get mine get yours, Vote for high school class president.

−2

sudoer777 wrote

Despite recent issues with Mozilla, on my PC I use Firefox hardened with GHacks user.js and a ton of extensions because it offers the best control over the websites I browse. I've tried Vivaldi, but it doesn't have Multi Account Containers, so I only use it when websites won't work with my hardened Firefox setup and for PWAs.

1

7seas wrote

The real purpose is a cia nigger trying to dox people but realizes nobody takes te bait so they get fired in a month. The website while costing 50 bucksa month will cost Americans over 50 million dollars on a pedo sting, meanwhile they will ignore all actual evidence.

−2