Recent comments

Rambler wrote (edited )

[RAMBLE], but I may be a bit biased.

Raddle is for the people who think reddit doesn't ban enough people for 'wrong think'. Unless you fall in line with the community approved thought then you'll get banned.

Don't forget about CumTown (I believe it's a podcast, not a... porn site), it's also powered by postmill.

edit:

Well, I went to jstpst to check it out, saw this same thread, wanted to read the comments:

https://www.jstpst.net/f/ask/5785/comment/10679 Apparently I'm a far-right and transphobic . (emma is the creator of postmill, the underlying code that powers this site)

And it appears raddle has already banned or removed your post, which sort of answers your question about how that site is operated. I wasn't kidding about 'wrong think'.

edit2: I figured I'd find a comment from raddle's admin. I know they nuked your thread and probably banned you, but I found this funny: https://images2.imgbox.com/d7/49/SFM03y2d_o.png

I guess we're a far-right site now.

3

AWiggerInTime wrote (edited )

Philadelphia stopped counting for some reason, Michigan went radio silent for a few hours just to come out with over 200k votes for Biden and not a single one for Trump., which is statistically impossible.

Virginia poll workers can literally take their ballot boxes home, some funny stuff happened with this. also here's some salt for the "factcheckers"

And not to mention the shitshow that were the mail-in ballots. Dead people voting. Regular people voting multiple times. Not to mention hundreds of thousands of missing ballots.

2

RoboGoat2000 wrote (edited )

There's a very long list of evidence, but I'll name just a few:
Dead voters
Double voters
Felon voters
Juvenile voters
Non-citizen voters
Out-of-state voters
Signature matching errors
Voting machine irregularities

Please, read about the total numbers of voter fraud and the methods for acquiring the data at https://navarroreport.com

2

eeqrhty wrote (edited )

Makes me feel less weird to hear that he does it too. I've always done it but it makes me feel like a paranoid weirdo just because no one else I know does it, even though I know I'm right.

But that's how it is with all this privacy stuff. Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean you're not being watched.

2

eeqrhty wrote (edited )

I was trying to helpfully direct you to a place where you can look into it yourself. Not everyone on the internet wants to get into a debate. I would have to write an extremely long essay to explain all the evidence I know about. I will say this about the video riddler brought up (who you were rude to for no reason).

First of all, you can see in the video that the observers are kept at an unreasonably far distance from where the counting is taking place. This was the case in multiple other states as well.

Secondly, the video shows that they were scanning ballots pulled out from containers after everyone else had gone home. Multiple media outlets reported that the ballot counters had gone home.

Regina Waller, the Fulton County public affairs manager for elections, told ABC News that the election department sent the State Farm Arena absentee ballot counters home at 10:30 p.m

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/pipe-bursts-atlanta-arena-causing-hour-delay-processing/story?id=73981348

They planned to stop scanning absentee ballots at 10:30 p.m. and pick it up back in the morning. No official could explain before press time why Fulton was stopping its count of absentee ballots at that time, only saying that was the procedure.

https://web.archive.org/web/20201207174145/https://www.ajc.com/news/atlanta-news/fulton-election-results-delayed-after-pipe-bursts-in-room-with-b%20allots/4T3KPQV7PBEX3JVAIGJBNBSVJY/

This matches up with the claims of the two Republican observers who gave sworn affidavits saying an election official sent people home some time after 10 pm. https://beta.documentcloud.org/documents/20420331-mitchell-harrison-affidavit

This debunking article quotes a source from the Secretary of State's office who said "they had a designated observer at that spot all night, the entire time".

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fox-news-reporter-debunks-georgia-election-fraud-claims-made-by-tucker-carlson-and-sean-hannity/ar-BB1bDEKp

But the observer only specifically claims to have been there from 11:52 pm to 12:45 am after leaving earlier in the evening

A state election board monitor, who asked for his name not to be used due to safety concerns, told Lead Stories on the phone on December 3, 2020, that he was present at the vote counting location beginning at 11:52 p.m., after leaving briefly at earlier in the evening. He then stayed until about 12:45 a.m., when the work that night was completed.

A different debunking article admits the scanners were unattended for about an hour

The scanners were unattended for about an hour until the election observer arrived, according to WSB-TV 2, though they were under video surveillance.

https://checkyourfact.com/2020/12/04/fact-check-video-show-ballots-suitcases-counted-georgia-poll-workers-leave/

The combination of the bogus water leak that supposedly was the reason for counting being delayed (no proof was provided for this), the claims of the media that night that counting had stopped, republican observers being kept far away, the mixed claims about whether the election observer was present the whole time or not… I think it’s suspicious. But this story is just one part of a lot of issues that have happened in multiple states.

3

burnerben wrote

hey man im not sure if you have eyes none the less a brain but its not hard to logic that they are more ballots that their bringing out for tomorrow or more counting and because of no audio in the footage it cant be ruled out that they were taking a break. if youd like to show me some solid evidence from credible sources id be happy to discuss.

−2

eeqrhty wrote

Reply to For real. by Rambler

Ok according to this meme I'm kinda smoothbrained. I don't recognize some of the logos.

What is the M inside the blue E and "FE" in the third panel?

What is the logo with eight dots in the last panel?

2

eeqrhty wrote

Honestly, there is so much to explain that it's not easy to even know where the best place is to begin. But if you want to look into it, you can check out some of the links on hereistheevidence.com and decide for yourself. Whether you think there was enough fraud to change the result or not, I think anyone who spends some time researching it would conclude that it's important to improve the security of our elections.

2

eeqrhty wrote

They can get a court order to collect user data for servers in the US, and for Parler I'm sure that has already happened. Though I wouldn't be surprised if Parler is a honeypot anyways. It's suspicious that they ask their users for personal information.

1