Recent comments

RichardButte wrote

E-mail is outdated, the steps required to get truly safe e-mailing is beyond regular users reach and trusting third parties to handle the technical security isn't the right way forward. Look at Tutanota and the recent forced backdooring.

The next step is rather to have personal end-to-end, peer-to-peer communication systems.

3

smooth_jazz wrote

Actually, any email provider+PGP is good, but incoming mail may not always be encrypted, and trusting the provider with your keys is a REALLY bad idea. Paranoid does this without storing your private keys like protonmail. They have a no-webmail policy (you'll need a mail client) and encrypt all incoming mail (if unencrypted) with your public key which is the only key they store.

3

Rambler wrote

Reply to comment by boobs in Requirement for a exit node? by Jogger

the primary requirement for an exit node that no one tells you about:

balls of steel.

Has anyone ever been arrested or held legally liable for running an exit node (in a modern country, like the US/CA/UK/Etc)?

I've thought about running one as well since my server provider is okay with it as long as I handle the abuse complaints which is basically copy/pasting a cookie cutter response on how it's an exit-node and not possible to tell the origin of whatever it is the complaint is about.

1

Rambler OP wrote

After a quick review I'll say: It's alright. A bit buggy. But hey, it's new. Hopefully in time it'll work those issues out.

It's never a bad thing to have options so I'm glad to see it regardless.

1

MrBlack OP wrote

Shoutout to the all the park rangers out there who leave people alone or humor them and listen to their incoherent ramblings about trees and waterfalls..

3