Recent comments in /f/Privacy
mr4channer wrote
fuck muslims
StreetMix wrote
Reply to No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
LMAO the article is retarded. Saying that faggotry is a good thing and FF is more secure.....I guess I do should use Brave after all.
boobs wrote
Reply to No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
I don't use brave because it's "good" I use it because firefox is shit and brave is just the next least shit browser.
hideyourlies wrote
As with everyone else, would not reccomend at all.
mr4channer wrote
dont use a phone
mr4channer wrote
good
mr4channer wrote
literally who
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to comment by KeeJef in 70TB of Parler users’ data leaked by security researchers by Rambler
Too much work for general shit-posting. It's not like you're filing your taxes or applying for a mortgage.
not_bob wrote
You don't. iOS and Android can't be trusted.
KeeJef wrote
Parler although probably well intentioned have been incompetent from the start. you needed to submit your Social Security Number and a photo of your driver's license to access some features. Crazyness
Rambler wrote
You can access Tor with ease using the official Tor Browser if you're on Android. I'm not sure I'd use it for anything like markets, though.
Toxicant wrote
A few users over at r/datahorders made back ups
MrBlack wrote
In a press release announcing the decision, Twilio revealed which services Parler was using. This information allowed hackers to deduct that it was possible to create users and verified accounts without actual verification.
With this type of access, newly minted users were able to get behind the login box API used for content delivery. That allowed them to see which users had moderator rights and this in turn allowed them to reset passwords of existing users with simple “forgot password” function. Since Twilio no longer authenticated emails, hackers were able to access admin accounts with ease.
burnerben OP wrote
Reply to comment by furry in im probably a paranoid mother fucker but ill write about this anyway by burnerben
i just got 1 hour of sleep that day so i think i already made an account of the person with my number last did.
SmokeyMeadow wrote
If you didn't see this coming, you need glasses.
Rambler OP wrote
Because, of course it was.
furry wrote (edited )
Burner and ben are two common words, almost 100% sure it is just coincidence. Also if you're making an psuedo email you probably shouldn't use the alias you go by; I recommend using a random string generator.
An another note, Protonmail doesn't let you use the standard recaptcha verification if it sees you are on a vpn or tor node so you either have to use your actual IP, verify with phone, verify with non-proton email, or make a donation. Proton claims that they don't log phone or email but it's up to you if you trust these claims.
If you're ultra-paranoid , I suggest getting a prepaid visa using cash and then signing up to Protonmail over tor and spend five dollars to verify your account (I believe the money goes towards one of the subscription plans they have, it doesn't just go to the void). Make sure to also use a long randomized password and change it often :3
mr4channer wrote
Reply to comment by !deleted152 in No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
lmao, it has built in crypto shit, what else do you need?
mr4channer wrote
Reply to The Data Big Tech Companies have on you by Rambler
ok
mr4channer wrote
Reply to No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
gnu icecat, pale moon, ungoogled chromium. brave is crypto miner
MrBlack wrote
In 2026 you'll have to scan your face to prove you're not a robot to access web content instead of completing captcha checks haha. Maybe not that but definitely something privacy stripping.
MrBlack wrote
I'm paranoid. You're on another level lol.
Rambler OP wrote
Reply to No, you shouldn't use Brave. by Rambler
I just found the article interesting and thought it was worth sharing. Brave may be better today, I don't know.
burnerben OP wrote
Reply to comment by mr4channer in im probably a paranoid mother fucker but ill write about this anyway by burnerben
im smarter then that
RoboGoat2000 wrote
Reply to Police have right to a suspect's internet info without a warrant, Arizona Supreme Court rules by Rambler
WTF, the same website posted another article concluding the exact opposite of OP's article: https://tucson.com/news/local/court-arizonans-have-right-to-internet-privacy-from-authorities-without-warrant/article_6a9375fe-3c88-5bee-ac2b-e0d5a8ce2ceb.html#tracking-source=article-related-bottom
My take away: Your personal info like name and address are protected, but what you do online is not.