Recent comments

lolz OP wrote

Reply to by lolz

my password is lolz123456

1

righttoprivacy wrote (edited )

This is sad. The walls over the garden grow ever taller. :'( I don't for a second believe he bought it for "free speech", as deamplification is admitted, and blocking nitter destroys neutral 3rd party searches.

And there are hidden owners. Believe some doc mentioned around 80? It was ten's of controlling interest owners, that much I remember.

2

z3d wrote

Reply to by whyO

Just posting a link to a site without any accompanying text is, more often than not, likely to get your post deleted. Please provide some context to your posts in future. (This thread will self-delete in 24 hours)

2

whyO OP wrote

Reply to comment by stormycloud in by whyO

No questions really besides why it was deleted, It's a cool page!

1

stormycloud wrote (edited )

Reply to by whyO

Yes what question do you have about the graphs?

1

Titlacahuan wrote

That is such a brilliant strategic move that shows long-term vision by Los Viagras. Such makeshift networking infrastructure may be the only viable way to resist the dominance of big ISPs by the ordinary population. Many a rebellion (see Emiliano Zapata Salazar) have started with small steps like this one.

The article is clearly biased against Los Viagras and I am clearly biased in their favor, but there are two sides to each story. Just like 20 years ago the US government was labeling anyone they didn't like "terrorists" these days Latin-American governments throw the word "cartel" left and right.

1