Gender. Straight is usually just to reference sexuality. There is the word "cis" for that but I don't tend to see it used that often outside of specific spaces. Saying non-lgbt was just quicker. Admittedly I was just talking about sexuality there, but you can apply a similar idea to gender.

I believe it. Always thought it was naive to assume that in the unimaginable vastness of space that we, humans and everything we know and continue to discover on earth, is the only thing in existence. Also always thought it was naive to assume that life outside of this planet requires the same ingredients to thrive as what we and what know require.

Who knows, though?

is there any other parts? does it also come with an economic, political and religious component or something? what am i missing here?

Hmm. Misread the view on that then. But you did ask earlier:

shit that's specific to lgbt people.

which is what?

That just covers the sexuality part.

read that post again please.

i am not asking for something that is exclusive to lgbt people. i asked if people experiencing sexuality differently is exclusive to lgbt.

is that really exclusive to lgbt?

straight?

how would you describe people that are not lgbt then?

where?

You did ask for something exclusive to lgbt people.

of course it isn't.

you know what is? using terms like non-lgbt or non-white. that shit doesn't help anyone.

people who share experiences talking about said experiences is not identity politics.

If everyone is like everyone else and no one has anything specific to them since we're all the same... why have any forums at all?

this is starting to sound like that idpol in-group / out-group talk now...

I've never heard of non-lgbt people having to deal with receiving hate for their sexuality for one.

is that really exclusive to lgbt?

lgbt people are just like everyone else, except for their experience of sexuality/gender.

shit that's specific to lgbt people.

which is what? aren't lgbt people just like everyone else?

yeah. you shouldn't give a shit if anyone is gay. i'm in favour.
this forum isn't here to insist that everyone should care, it's here for lgbt people to talk about shit that's specific to lgbt people.

LGBT people's existence doesn't offend me at all.

The assumption that I have to give a shit that someone is gay or whatever does. No one cares, welcome to equality.

let's be real, the web is all google.

the standards body: basically a front for google chrome devs

the implementation: everything built atop google chrome, firefox funded by google

where you visit: google or indirectly linked to google

the web has been lost for a while you are just realizing it. stop being in denial. we need to build something new.

Edited for simplicity, Brave doesn't use miners. Everyone wants to use crypto but when a browser integrates with crypto it's bad? Brave redirected to thier own crypto referrals when used, wich I actually support doing, they shoulda been super upfront and had a toggle on switch for it though. I want them to be paid without having to sell my data.

I am not too sure.

It's pretty sad that most schools require Zoom despite them being pieces of shit. I don't really get why. It's not like Zoom has amazing functionalities that trump over stuff like Jitsi. I've been using Jitsi for a while now and I've literally lost zero functionality. I just send the students the meeting link and they open it on their browser and voila.