Recent comments

Rambler OP wrote (edited )

Reply to by Rambler

I used to actually use this site/resource often to listen to my own signals on various frequencies before I discovered simpler ways of determining where a signal/packet is being heard from.

Either way, still a neat site to just find a random location, tune around and see what you can hear.

You can also use it in combination of opensource tools like to decode morescode, to receive weatherfax images, to decode amateur radio signals like FT8, JS8, HELL, PSK, etc.

Or maybe you just want to listen to some shortwave stations or listen to some old amateur radio enthusiasts talk about their health issues. Can certainly get lost in this.

1

trwII wrote

yeah, federation is a quite wide topic. in our case (rocksolid), we just feed all the messages received on the websites into newsgroups, and all the new messages from the newsgroups into the websites (so we bridge nntp and http). the postmill author(s) considered federation at one point (although with a different method), but dropped this part of the code later on.

btw: my original account was not accessible for me any more, so I created trwII.

cheers

trw

1

Rambler OP wrote

this is great news. next step should be to get rid of the ATF. also fuck the ATF

It's definitely in my top 3 least liked federal agencies.

"So what should we do today guys? Issue a statement on vertical foregrips? What if we say shouldering a pistol brace may be unlawful? Shoot some dogs? Someone want to draw a manufacturer out of a hat and fuck with 'em for a bit?"

1

Rambler OP wrote

Do I have to manually clear notifications?

Yeah. Which is handy for people like me who reads a message and then responds hours later. But obviously it should be an end user option to clear upon read or clear manually.

I'll add it to the to do list.

2

Wahaha wrote

Reply to comment by !deleted261 in by !deleted152

Why shouldn't it, though? Privacy obviously isn't a huge concern for most people, else the "have nothing to hide crowd" wouldn't be the majority.

1

Wahaha wrote

Reply to comment by !deleted152 in by !deleted152

You find it reasonable for a paid actor to say that one movie they did ten years ago should now be forbidden because they feel like it? I find the notion ridiculous.

Pictures of you are only personal if taken in a personal space. If your picture is taken while you are at a train station, for example, that is not personal data of you. It's a picture of a public place that you happened to be in as part of the public.

If you decide to appear in a movie, the expectation should be for other people to see it. Otherwise, why do it in the first place? Isn't the entire point of doing so to share it with others? Even if those others are only expected to be a small, private audience. How could a difference in audience size lead to the experience to become haunting and traumatizing? Violation of privacy, sure, but that's a completely different issue.

This also reminds me of the hero buying nude pictures from sluts only to send those pictures to their parents. The sluts were probably 'haunted' and 'traumatized' by that, too, despite openly selling their own nudes.

1